In a move called "one of the biggest — and most audacious — deregulatory actions of the Trump administration," President Trump yesterday announced plans to weaken the National Environmental Policy Act for federal infrastructure projects.
"President Trump on Wednesday unilaterally weakened one of the nation’s bedrock conservation laws, the National Environmental Policy Act, limiting public review of federal infrastructure projects to speed up the permitting of freeways, power plants and pipelines," reports Lisa Friedman.
"In doing so, the Trump administration claimed it will save hundreds of millions of dollars over almost a decade by significantly reducing the amount of time allowed to complete reviews of major infrastructure projects."
The move culminates years of small steps and threats (or promises, depending on your perspective), to ease permitting processes for infrastructure projects in the United States by rolling back the protections of NEPA.
- During the State of the Union delivered in January 2018, for instance, President Trump promised to ease permitting processes but without mentioning specifics.
- In April 2018, "Trump administration agencies, including Transportation, Housing, Interior and Energy, signed an administration memo Monday pledging to speed up permitting on major infrastructure projects using a two-year target," according to an article by Michael Laris, but no specific mention of NEPA yet.
- In August 2018, the Trump administration's focus on NEPA became a little more clear, as the U.S. Department of Transportation announced new policies that required much shorter NEPA documentation, and located oversight of NEPA processes to one federal agency.
- Lisa Friedman reported in January 2020 on a proposed rule that removed the requirement to consider climate change in NEPA reviews. Additional coverage by The Washington Post and Yale Climate Connections offers additional insight about the potential consequences of the proposed rule change.
- And then in June 2020, the Trump administration was reported to be in preparation of an executive order waving protections of both NEPA and the Endangered Species Act.
Regarding more specific details of the changes enacted by President Trump this week, Friedman explains:
The final rule sets new hard deadlines of between one and two years to complete environmental studies, according to two people who have seen the document but were not authorized to speak about it publicly.
The rule will also allow agencies to develop categories of activities that do not require an environmental assessment at all.
And in one of the most bitterly contested provisions, the rule would free federal agencies from having to consider the impacts of infrastructure projects on climate change. It does so by eliminating the need for agencies to analyze a project’s indirect or “cumulative” effects on the environment and specifying they are only required to analyze “reasonably foreseeable” impacts.
President Trump announced the change during an appearance at the U.P.S. Hapeville Airport Hub in Atlanta. The Associated Press provided a report on the announcement as well. In each article, critics are quick to speak out against the changes, and predict that rolling back NEPA will fail to provide an economic boost, as president Trump promises.
Read the full story: Trump Weakens Major Conservation Law to Speed Construction Permits
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour
If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.
Chicago breaks ground on $3 billion megadevelopment
The new neighborhood, titled Foundry Park, will one day host 3,700 residences.
Satanic Place Names
From streams and lakes to valleys and canyons, I mapped more than 1,000 places named after the Devil.
California High-Speed Rail Authority CEO resigns after $600,000 scandal
Under Ian Choudri, the authority used taxpayer dollars to fund first class flights and trips to nightclubs.
Want to study the Missouri River? Soon, you may need unanimous approval from 10 states
Legislation would require 10 governors’ permission to study or build projects moving water outside the basin.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority