U.S. Supreme Court Rejects Case Threatening the California Coastal Act
"In a significant win for beach access rights in California, the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday rejected a Silicon Valley billionaire’s appeal to keep a beach to himself," reports Rosanna Xia.
The billionaire: Martins Beach in San Mateo County. The billionaire: Vinod Khosla.
"What began as a local dispute over a locked gate has exploded into a cause célèbre for beachgoers across California. The decade-long squabble spurred a spate of lawsuits that zeroed in on whether property owner Vinod Khosla needs state permission to gate off the road."
Much more was risk in the controversy than just one gate and one beach. The U.S. Supreme Court could have potentially overturned the decision of a string of California court decisions, and dismantled the "landmark" California Coastal Act.
Topics
- The Year in Skyscraper Construction
- A Compelling Case for Protected Bike Lanes
- Is Pay by Distance Unfair to the Poor?
- Understanding the 'Dark Store Theory' Costing Local Governments Millions in Property Tax
- Rising Homelessness, Erroneous Data: Rethinking Utah's 'Housing First' Policy
- Let's Hope Trump Considers Infrastructure a National Security Issue Too
- A Better Travel Experience
- Mall of America Gets Opportunity Zone Status
- CA Gov.: Cities Must Meet Housing Goals or State Will Withhold Gas Tax Funds
- Congestion Pricing Takes Major Step Forward in New York City
- Defense Department Calls Climate Change a National Security Threat
- Inland Waterways Looking for a Comeback
- The 'Latino Homeless Paradox'
- Seattle Rebrands its Planned Bus Rapid Transit System: Stride
- How Do Downtown Homes Prices Compare?
- New Taxi Fee Could Have Lethal Consequences
- Plan to Speed Up Relief Line Construction Pitched in Toronto
- Needed: A New Approach to the Colorado River
- Another Lawsuit Complicates Purple Line Plans in Maryland
- Bill Would Make California's Urban State HIghways Safer for Non-Motorists
