Seattle shows how new buildings and new trees can be added to a city simultaneously—in fact, neighborhoods adding new buildings are maintaining its urban tree canopy while static single-family neighborhoods are losing trees.

Dan Bertolet shares news about Seattle's effort to grow and maintain its tree canopy even while building new residential and commercial buildings to keep pace with its rapid growth. There's a catch to the consequences of Seattle's population and economic growth.
Seattle’s best new data [pdf] on the change in tree canopy over time does show a 6 percent decline between 2007 and 2015. Here’s the catch, though: most of the confirmed tree loss happened on land reserved for detached houses, the single-family zones that cover over half the city but where population has barely budged for decades.
Meanwhile, the same study found no statistically significant change in tree canopy [pdf] where the growth actually has been happening: the land zoned for commercial buildings and multifamily housing that absorbed the vast majority of Seattle’s new apartments, offices, and stores.
Bertolet cites the data to build an argument against some opponents of development who would use trees as a prop in a narrative about he destructive consequences of urban infill as the city reconsiders its tree ordinance. "Tree preservation rules that would sacrifice new urban homes—that is, housing that can accommodate a lot of people on a small amount of land—becomes even more indefensible when you factor in the resulting shift of development pressure toward places where low-density housing construction obliterates far more trees," writes Bertolet.
The article then expands its purview to include analysis from Treepedia's Green View Index, which "quantifies how much tree cover a person at street level experiences," according to Bertolet. That tool allows comparisons between Seattle and other cities like Portland, Sacramento, Los Angeles, and Vancouver, British Columbia.
Bertolet's comprehensive, feature-length examination of Seattle's tree canopy didn't go unnoticed in Portland either. Rachel Monahan and Michael Andersen both picked up the story and applied its lessons to Portland.
FULL STORY: No, Seattle's Growth Boom Is Not a Tree Apocalypse

Rethinking Redlining
For decades we have blamed 100-year-old maps for the patterns of spatial racial inequity that persist in American cities today. An esteemed researcher says: we’ve got it all wrong.

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

Montreal Mall to Become 6,000 Housing Units
Place Versailles will be transformed into a mixed-use complex over the next 25 years.

Santa Clara County Dedicates Over $28M to Affordable Housing
The county is funding over 600 new affordable housing units via revenue from a 2016 bond measure.

Why a Failed ‘Smart City’ Is Still Relevant
A Google-backed proposal to turn an underused section of Toronto waterfront into a tech hub holds relevant lessons about privacy and data.

When Sears Pioneered Modular Housing
Kit homes sold in catalogs like Sears and Montgomery Ward made homeownership affordable for midcentury Americans.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
City of Astoria
Transportation Research & Education Center (TREC) at Portland State University
Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada
Toledo-Lucas County Plan Commissions