Seattle shows how new buildings and new trees can be added to a city simultaneously—in fact, neighborhoods adding new buildings are maintaining its urban tree canopy while static single-family neighborhoods are losing trees.
Dan Bertolet shares news about Seattle's effort to grow and maintain its tree canopy even while building new residential and commercial buildings to keep pace with its rapid growth. There's a catch to the consequences of Seattle's population and economic growth.
Seattle’s best new data [pdf] on the change in tree canopy over time does show a 6 percent decline between 2007 and 2015. Here’s the catch, though: most of the confirmed tree loss happened on land reserved for detached houses, the single-family zones that cover over half the city but where population has barely budged for decades.
Meanwhile, the same study found no statistically significant change in tree canopy [pdf] where the growth actually has been happening: the land zoned for commercial buildings and multifamily housing that absorbed the vast majority of Seattle’s new apartments, offices, and stores.
Bertolet cites the data to build an argument against some opponents of development who would use trees as a prop in a narrative about he destructive consequences of urban infill as the city reconsiders its tree ordinance. "Tree preservation rules that would sacrifice new urban homes—that is, housing that can accommodate a lot of people on a small amount of land—becomes even more indefensible when you factor in the resulting shift of development pressure toward places where low-density housing construction obliterates far more trees," writes Bertolet.
The article then expands its purview to include analysis from Treepedia's Green View Index, which "quantifies how much tree cover a person at street level experiences," according to Bertolet. That tool allows comparisons between Seattle and other cities like Portland, Sacramento, Los Angeles, and Vancouver, British Columbia.
Bertolet's comprehensive, feature-length examination of Seattle's tree canopy didn't go unnoticed in Portland either. Rachel Monahan and Michael Andersen both picked up the story and applied its lessons to Portland.
Read the full story: No, Seattle's Growth Boom Is Not a Tree Apocalypse
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour
If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.
Desperate measures: Advocates weigh draining Lake Powell to fill Colorado River
Draining the reservoir could reduce evaporation losses by a couple hundred thousand acre-feet.
US buildings threatened, destroyed by fires set to triple by 2060
Researchers found a high fire risk for socioeconomically vulnerable neighborhoods in the American West.
LA residents may be allowed to paint their own crosswalks
Councilwoman Katy Yaroslavsky put out a motion instructing the Los Angeles Department of Public Transportation to study the feasibility of allowing volunteers to paint crosswalks.
Dallas moves to overhaul its zoning code
The city's zoning reform will allow more multi-family and mixed-use developments.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority