Not if they live in a large metro area.

Today on Twitter, I noticed more discussion than usual of a survey by Pew Research Center, which purported to show that most Americans still prefer suburban sprawl to walkable communities.
The Pew poll asks respondents where they would prefer an area where houses are “larger and farther apart, but schools, stores and restaurants are several miles away” or an area where houses are smaller, but these destinations are within walking distance. 57 percent chose the nonwalkable alternative. So Americans want sprawl, right?
Not necessarily. Another survey, conducted by the National Association of Realtors (NAR), shows very different results. This survey asked people whether they would prefer “houses with large yards and you have to drive to the places you need to go” or “houses with small yards, and it is easy to walk to the places you need to go.” 56 percent chose the walkable alternative- even more than in 2017 (before the COVID pandemic made dense urban areas less popular).
Another question in the NAR survey asked Americans whether they would prefer an apartment or townhouse closer to work and within walking distances of shops and restaurants, or a single-family house “where you have to drive to shops and restaurants and have a longer commute to work.” Given that even some people who otherwise favor walkable neighborhoods also want a single-family house, you might think that only a tiny minority of people would favor the “walkable apartment” answer. But you would be wrong! In fact, 53 percent chose the apartment/walkability combination.
The NAR also asked people to rank various qualities of a home from most important to least important. 63 percent of people chose low levels of crime as one of their first two choices. But walkability was second; 35 percent chose “walkable to shops and restaurants” as one of their top two choices, more than “a large house” (31 percent), “a large yard” (27 percent) or even “high quality public schools” (25 percent). And a stunning 78 percent said that they would pay more to live in an area "where you could easily walk to parks, shops and restaurants."
Why do these surveys yield such drastically different results? The Pew survey notes that 3/4 of rural respondents favor the less walkable alternative; thus, that survey was apparently designed to include a representative sample of Americans, including rural Americans who typically do live in very spread-out environments. It seems to me quite natural that rural Americans would prefer rural lifestyles.
But once rural respondents are excluded, the balance between sprawl and walkable communities in the Pew survey becomes almost a toss-up. 57 percent of urban respondents refer houses with smaller yards and more walkability, and an almost-equal percentage of suburban respondents prefer the opposite.
By contrast, the NAR survey is limited to adults in the fifty largest metropolitan areas—in other words, no rural or even small-town Americans. This group includes almost every metro area with over a million people, even smaller ones like Birmingham or Buffalo. Thus, this group includes very few ruralites, and even the suburbanites in the sample probably have longer and more painful commutes than they would if they lived in a smaller metro area or in the country. Thus, it seems to me natural that the NAR respondents would be more receptive to less car-dependent lifestyles.

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

Chicago’s Ghost Rails
Just beneath the surface of the modern city lie the remnants of its expansive early 20th-century streetcar system.

San Antonio and Austin are Fusing Into one Massive Megaregion
The region spanning the two central Texas cities is growing fast, posing challenges for local infrastructure and water supplies.

Since Zion's Shuttles Went Electric “The Smog is Gone”
Visitors to Zion National Park can enjoy the canyon via the nation’s first fully electric park shuttle system.

Trump Distributing DOT Safety Funds at 1/10 Rate of Biden
Funds for Safe Streets and other transportation safety and equity programs are being held up by administrative reviews and conflicts with the Trump administration’s priorities.

German Cities Subsidize Taxis for Women Amid Wave of Violence
Free or low-cost taxi rides can help women navigate cities more safely, but critics say the programs don't address the root causes of violence against women.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
planning NEXT
Appalachian Highlands Housing Partners
Mpact (founded as Rail~Volution)
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
City of Astoria
City of Portland
City of Laramie
