In statements that echo the alarm of March 2020, transit officials in Los Angeles and Washington, D.C. recently announced plans to reduce transit service.
With every passing month, the continued operation of public transit systems in the United States looks more like a pilot project than a long-term feature of the transportation system. The transit systems of the pre-pandemic United States, paltry and inadequate as they might have been, might never return.
Repeated infusions of cash from the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, approved in November 2021 and multiple pandemic relief packages (i.e., the CARES Act, approved in March 2020; the COVID-19 Emergency Relief Act of 2020, approved in December 2020; and the American Rescue Plan, approved in March 2021) haven't been enough to eliminate the threats bearing down on transit agencies. Depressed ridership numbers, reduced revenues, and driver shortages all still threaten to overwhelm any chance of recovery for public transit.
Two recent examples showcase the ongoing challenges.
The Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (L.A. Metro) recently announced plans to cut scheduled bus service by 12 percent starting on February 20, according to a February 1 article by Ryan Fonseca for LAist. The announcements of the reduced service came just a few days after Metro announced a $1.24 billion grant of American Rescue Plan funds for the maintenance and operation of service. With or without the $1.4 billion, L.A. Metro is short 550 bus drivers, and any rider (including this author) relying on the system in recent months can attest that service has suffered. L.A. Metro reports on trip cancellations every month, most recently calculating that 17.7 percent of total bus trips were cancelled in January, up from 10.8% in December. The 754, which runs along the busy Vermont Avenue corridor as one of the system's few remaining rapid routes, cancelled 50% of its trips in January. Viewed charitably, the planned service reductions are bringing the planned system closer in line with reality.
According to Fonseca, L.A. Metro plans to roll out the service cuts, relying on the tiered system of headway frequency implemented by the NextGen system redesign. The new frequencies on bus routes will be as follows:
- Tier 1 service frequency: 5-15 minutes weekday; 7.5-20 minutes weekend
- Tier 2 service frequency: 12-20 minutes weekday; 15-40 minutes weekend
- Tier 3 service frequency: 20-45 minutes weekday; 30-60 minutes weekend
- Tier 4 service frequency: 40-60 minutes weekday and weekend
Train service will also be reduced, according to Fonseca:
- The B (Red) and D (Purple) lines will run every 15 minutes at peak service times and 15 minutes midday and weekends
- The A (Blue), C (Green), E (Expo) and L (Gold) lines will run every 10 minutes during peak service times
Then there's Washington, D.C., where transit officials, given the lack of D.C. statehood, are compelled to report to Congress on the state of the transit system. At a hearing of the Oversight subcommittee on government operations, Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (D.C. Metro) General Manager Paul J. Wiedefield announced that pre-pandemic transit service would not be coming back.
An article by Justin George for the Washington Post details the revelations of the hearing, putting the news in context of the ongoing challenges facing the transit system.
"Metro leaders are scrambling to find solutions for a $500 million shortfall beginning next summer, stemming from lost fares as riders gave up transit during the pandemic. Many office workers have opted to telework, including the federal workforce that made up 40 percent of the system’s rush-hour customers before the pandemic," writes George.
D.C. Metro officials anticipate having to face a budget shortfall exacerbated by years of maintenance issues, pandemic ridership declines, and driver shortages, when the finite amount of federal support provided during the pandemic, $1 billion, runs out in 2023 and 2024.
The financial risks facing transit agencies was one of the earliest signs of the pandemic's potential to upend life in U.S. communities, and one of the most obvious and urgent concerns for planners trying to assess the pandemic's effects. While federal funding has kept many systems afloat—much more than seemed possible in early March 2020—the full consequences of the emergency have only been delayed. System capacity has declined right along with ridership—neither of which are likely to return to pre-pandemic levels given the current politics of transportation and land use planning in the United States. Drivers and operators are in short supply, and neither are likely to become suddenly abundant given the current politics of public sector compensation.
Something's got to give. It's a question of when, not if.
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour
If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.
Desperate measures: Advocates weigh draining Lake Powell to fill Colorado River
Draining the reservoir could reduce evaporation losses by a couple hundred thousand acre-feet.
Los Angeles just elected an urban planner as its mayor
Transportation analysts are optimistic that Raman will be more aggressive in addressing transit issues than Bass.
Mamdani’s pied-à-terre tax survives legal challenge
A panel of judges found that the plaintiffs failed to demonstrate injury as a result of New York City's implementation of the tax.
Eastern Nebraska is running out of electricity
Data centers and electrification are straining eastern Nebraska’s grid, throttling economic development.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
University of Michigan School for Environment and Sustainability (SEAS)
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority