Legislation to authorize a pilot program, authored by the chair of the California Senate Transportation Committee, Mark DeSaulnier, D-Concord, "gives the California Transportation Agency, the Department of Motor Vehicles and other agencies authorization to track vehicle miles traveled by motorists in a yet-to-be-determined city starting in January 2016, according to the language in the bill," writes Steve Scauzillo, about SB 1077, California's initial legislative step in what could eventually lead to a mileage-based user fee program.
If approved, the pilot would be the first in California but the third in the nation, behind similar test programs in Washington and Oregon, said Sharon Neely, transportation expert with the Southern California Association of Governments.
DeSaulnier clearly wants a "go-slow" approach in the pilot. In his FAQ webpage, he writes, "The bill does not allow the California Transportation Agency to even collect fees from volunteers participating in the study. The bill asks the California Transportation Agency to conduct what amounts to a hypothetical dry run of a mileage-based fee and report its findings to the Legislature."
In Michigan, a new report "prepared for the Michigan Environmental Council by Sustainable Mobility & Accessibility Research & Transformation (SMART) at (University of Michigan) proposes that the state move to a mileage fee funding program," writes Paul Egan of the Detroit Free Press.
“Instead of continuing to raise fuel taxes to pay for transportation infrastructure, a mileage fee could more fairly allocate costs based on the number of miles driven, the time of day, the route taken, and the weight of the vehicle,” the report says.
What's clear is that mileage fee advocates shouldn't expect rapid progress when it comes to transitioning away from state gas taxes, a proven, but what many say, is an unsustainable means of revenue collection due to increased fuel efficiency of vehicles, more electric vehicles on the road, declining miles traveled, and most important of all, the political unwillingness to raise fuel taxes.