Elon Musk Cleared to Tunnel in Southern California
Elon Musk will get a first chance to prove predictions that the Boring Company can improve tunneling technology after the city of Hawthorne in Los Angeles County approved his plan to build a two-mile tunnel.
"Hawthorne leaders have signed off on construction of tech tycoon Elon Musk’s first test tunnel for electric vehicles extending west from SpaceX headquarters," reports Sandy Mazza.
"The City Council approved the two-mile underground track Tuesday night in a 4-1 vote," adds Mazza. Tunneling work could now begin any day.
Mazza's coverage includes details on Musk's grander plans for the Boring Company, and its envisioned connection to the Hyperloop. No mention, however, of how such a substantive infrastructural project managed to navigate the city's planning process, not to mention the state and federal environmental review processes, so quickly.
Published on Wednesday, August 23, 2017 in
Topics
- Which Cities Have the Most Breweries Per Capita
- Cities on the Verge of a Housing Crisis
- Automobile Dependency in Action
- Do Denser Neighborhoods Have Safer Streets?
- The Generational Warfare of Our Times
- On the Massive Carbon Savings of Gentle Density
- The Case for Upzoning
- U.S. Department of Transportation Launches Two New University Transportation Centers
- The Small City Leading the New Era of Redevelopment in California
- What Seattle Learned From Studying its Public Golf Courses
- Scooter Vigilante Shut Down
- Report Details the Many Risks of Climate Change Facing Queens
- Latest Version of the Seattle Bike Plan Restores Some Previously Discarded Bike Lanes
- World's Largest Co-Living Development Coming to San Jose
- A Route Through the City, S.F. Crosstown Trail Opens
- The Devil's in the Details for Houston's Hobby Line Light Rail Planning
- 20-20-20: Montreal Sets New Goals for Inclusionary Zoning
- Feds Close Cedar Rapids ADA Case
- For Lack of Free Parking, Downtown San Jose Loses a Grocery Store
- Summertime Ethanol Restriction Lifted to Help Corn Farmers—But at What Cost?
