Charles Marohn responds to Noah Smith's article asking why American Infrastructure is so expensive and delivers a plan to attack the problem.
American infrastructure incentives are badly misaligned, according to an article by Noah Smith, published in May for Bloomberg.
Following up on that story for Strong Towns, Charles Marohn argues that until we fix the incentives for infrastructure, "throwing more money at this system is simply pouring good money after bad." Marohn starts with the example of a policy that provides federal funding based on lane miles of highways, and programs that pay for around 90 percent of new construction but only 50 percent of maintenance. Marohn reasons that these incentives don't push projects to be well-managed and cost-efficient, nor built with the goal to endure.
To fix these types of misalignments, Marohn outlines a plan in four parts. He argues that localities should be given tools and encouraged to raise their own funding for these projects, so that they will be incentivized not to impress federal services whose rules and mandates have to be made broad enough to serve the whole country but, instead, built to serve their own local needs.
To reward planning for the long-term, Marohn says, "[t]he only tool I would take off the table -- or at least constrain -- is debt. Cities should have the ability to take on cash flow take and make strategic investments with debt, but they should not be able to live beyond their means today -- intentionally or not -- at the expense of future generations." He goes on to suggest that funding should be tied to very specific initiatives, like a toll or sales tax to pay for specific maintenance. Lastly, he suggests tying the design, construction, and warranty for projects into a single contract so contractors are motivated to create lasting success instead of just passing the buck.
FULL STORY: THIS IS WHY INFRASTRUCTURE IS SO EXPENSIVE
Pennsylvania Mall Conversion Bill Passes House
If passed, the bill would promote the adaptive reuse of defunct commercial buildings.
Planning for Accessibility: Proximity is More Important than Mobility
Accessibility-based planning minimizes the distance that people must travel to reach desired services and activities. Measured this way, increased density can provide more total benefits than increased speeds.
World's Largest Wildlife Overpass In the Works in Los Angeles County
Caltrans will soon close half of the 101 Freeway in order to continue construction of the Wallis Annenberg Wildlife Crossing near Agoura Hills in Los Angeles County.
Amtrak Takes Lead on Texas Central Rail
The high-speed rail project isn’t a done deal, but if it moves forward, trains could begin operating in 2030.
Maine Approves Rent Relief Program
Legislators hope the assistance program will help struggling low-income households avoid eviction.
How Transit Architecture Impacts Real and Perceived Safety
More than a third of Americans believe major transit systems are too unsafe to ride. The built environment can change that.
City of Costa Mesa
Licking County
Barrett Planning Group LLC
HUD's Office of Policy Development and Research
Mpact Transit + Community
HUD's Office of Policy Development and Research
Tufts University, Department of Urban and Environmental Policy & Planning
City of Universal City TX
ULI Northwest Arkansas
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.