Recent analysis shows that Americans are less willing to pay extra for large houses. It's information best viewed skeptically, but it's also worth considering why this trend has finally, semmingly swung the other way.
Joe Cortright continues an ongoing crusade to elucidate the facts about the creation and consumption of McMansions in the housing market.
Cortright's commentary follows a round of "downbeat" stories about the demand for McMansions. Stories from Bloomberg and the Chicago Tribune followed the lead of Trulia's Ralph McLaughlin, who compared price trajectories of 3,000- to 5,000-square-foot homes built between 2001 and 2007 with all other homes in each metropolitan area. "McLaughlin found that since 2012, the premium that buyers paid for these big houses fell pretty sharply in most major metropolitan markets around the country," explains Cortright. "Overall, the big house premium fell from about 137 percent in 2012 to 118 percent this year."
According to Cortright, the falling premiums for McMansions might have to do with the aging process: "Like new cars, McMansions may have their highest value when they leave the showroom…" But according to Cortright, another factor could also be working against the McMansion: as demand for urban, walkable areas has increased, demand for McMansions built on the periphery of metropolitan areas has not gone unscathed.
Finally, says Cortright, the market factors that drove the boom in McMansions in the bubble years just no longer exist.
The bad news for the McMansion market is new—Planetizen was picking up stories that reported of a renewed trend toward houses of larger and larger sizes around the United States as recently as July of 2016 (and also in June 2014). Cortright, however, offered a dissenting opinion about how the real estate's data skewed toward a false portrayal of McMansion dominance in the market.
Read the full story: McMansions Fading Away?
Pittsburgh Median Home Price is Lowest in the US at $250K
After the collapse of the U.S. steel industry, the city was left with a glut of affordable homes.
Toronto Condo Sales Drop 75%
In two of Canada’s most expensive cities, more condos were built than ever — and sales are plummeting.
What’s in a Name? Investors vs. Speculators
We don’t often make a clear distinction between investors and speculators, which makes it harder to identify harmful behavior — and to find solutions for it.
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour
If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.
Desperate measures: Advocates weigh draining Lake Powell to fill Colorado River
Draining the reservoir could reduce evaporation losses by a couple hundred thousand acre-feet.
California appears to reject Prop. 45
The proposition would have expanded the projects that qualify for a streamlined environmental review, effectively paring down the California Environmental Quality Act.
Bay area voters pass ‘crucial lifeline’ for transit
Proposition RTM, which will fund Bay Area transit, has approval from 61% of voters as of 9:45 p.m. on Nov. 3.
Voters across the country reject data centers
Dozens of communities voted on measures to restrict the buildout of data centers.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority