There's a rationale for the demolition of vacant properties in cities like Chicago, but does that mean the city should be celebrating these programs? The planning of shrinking cities, it turns out, is still very much a work in progress.

An article by Chris Hagan tackles some of the troubling aspects of demolition programs in the city of Chicago.
First there's the question of whether the city's many demolition programs, resulting in the demolition of 3,100 buildings since 2008, are laying a foundation for neighborhood revitalization. In areas where private developers are pulling demolition permits, redevelopment often follows. The same potential for redevelopment isn't present when the city demolishes buildings, according to Hagan.
The article focuses on the varying goals and results of the city's approach to vacant lots and city-owned properties. Despite efforts to intervene with troubled buildings and properties (examples include the Large Lots Program, the Troubled Building Initiative, and a forfeiture program for vacant buildings) the city currently owns about 15,000 vacant lots, according to Hagan.
Thus, the question of how residents should feel about buildings being torn down in the neighborhoods. Pubic officials are ready to laud demolition programs as a win for public safety and redevelopment. The article opens with an anecdote about a press conference "kicking off the latest city initiative to tear down vacant buildings in high-crime police districts," which included a "group of Chicago city officials — including now-Chicago Police Superintendent Eddie Johnson" speaking into a "an official City of Chicago podium with microphones jutting out the top."
So should the city be celebrating when it tears down another building, or its 100th building, or any building—especially when it doesn't always have a plan for what comes next?
FULL STORY: Should Chicago Be Celebrating Demolitions?

Alabama: Trump Terminates Settlements for Black Communities Harmed By Raw Sewage
Trump deemed the landmark civil rights agreement “illegal DEI and environmental justice policy.”

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

The 120 Year Old Tiny Home Villages That Sheltered San Francisco’s Earthquake Refugees
More than a century ago, San Francisco mobilized to house thousands of residents displaced by the 1906 earthquake. Could their strategy offer a model for the present?

In Both Crashes and Crime, Public Transportation is Far Safer than Driving
Contrary to popular assumptions, public transportation has far lower crash and crime rates than automobile travel. For safer communities, improve and encourage transit travel.

Report: Zoning Reforms Should Complement Nashville’s Ambitious Transit Plan
Without reform, restrictive zoning codes will limit the impact of the city’s planned transit expansion and could exclude some of the residents who depend on transit the most.

Judge Orders Release of Frozen IRA, IIJA Funding
The decision is a victory for environmental groups who charged that freezing funds for critical infrastructure and disaster response programs caused “real and irreparable harm” to communities.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Clanton & Associates, Inc.
Jessamine County Fiscal Court
Institute for Housing and Urban Development Studies (IHS)
City of Grandview
Harvard GSD Executive Education
Toledo-Lucas County Plan Commissions
Salt Lake City
NYU Wagner Graduate School of Public Service