Creating an Urban Mobility Ecosystem Helps Public and Private Actors

With new transportation options coming to cities from a plethora of innovators and entrepreneurs, how will public transit agencies respond? Are these modes in competition, or does their widespread use actually benefit one another?

2 minute read

March 29, 2016, 5:00 AM PDT

By Elana Eden


A recent VerdeXchange 2016 panel brought together the public and private sectors to hash out these complex questions. Santa Monica City Manager Rick Cole moderated a conversation among LADOT General Manager Seleta Reynolds, Lyft Transportation Policy Manager Emily Castor, Scoot founder Michael Keating, and Alta Motors CEO Marc Fenigstein.

Castor pointed out that for transportation network companies like Uber or Lyft, a strong public transit system is not a threat, but a boon to the bottom line.

"The more viable it is for people to live here without owning a car, the more likely it is that they’re going to use Lyft frequently in combination with transit and other modes," she explained. "We need to look at how we can create this robust ecosystem together."

The key, and sometimes sticking point, is "together." "How do you innovate inside a bureaucracy? How does government do startups?" Reynolds asked. "What is the most effective role for the public sector in the midst of all of this very welcome—and sometimes unwelcome—disruption?"

What works best for both the public and private sectors, the panelists agreed, is cooperatively fostering a multiplicity of options that "overlap but don’t fully substitute for one another." And it works for people: Options allow customization, which gives the efficient movement of people primacy over any particular type of vehicle.

That creates plenty of space in the market for sorely needed innovation.

One example is Scoot, an electric scooter-sharing service based in San Francisco and seeking to enter the L.A. market. "Our core rider is a transit rider who is sometimes in a hurry," founder Keating told the audience—only semi-joking.

No discussion of transportation innovation can avoid considering the coming of autonomous vehicles, of course. Also covered: the influence of transportation on public space, the place of bike-share in the transportation ecosystem, public-private partnership and co-branding services, equity in transportation planning, and more.

An edited transcript of VerdeXchange's panel "Disruption on Wheels: A New Mobility Model For Cities" is printed in The Planning Report.

Wednesday, March 16, 2016 in The Planning Report

"Planetizen federal action tracker" logo superimposed over black and white image of US Capitol dome.

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker

A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

October 28, 2026 - Zachary Whalen

A car drives through a puddle, making a large splash. Rain pours down.

California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour

If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.

October 28, 2026 - Grist

Lake Powell with much of the water evaporated.

Desperate measures: Advocates weigh draining Lake Powell to fill Colorado River

Draining the reservoir could reduce evaporation losses by a couple hundred thousand acre-feet.

October 30, 2026 - Yale Environment 360

People vote in Chicago behind blue privacy screens

Chicago voters approve permanent festival grounds, penalty for vacant property owners

Currently, major summer and fall festivals take over public parks for weeks at a time, drawing criticism from nearby residents

November 5 - Block Club Chicago

Mayor Zohran Mamdani speaks into a microphone. He wears a gray suit.

NYC votes to cut outdoor dining red tape, speed up permitting

New York City also voted to allow the Department of Transportation to begin work on urgent projects before notifying elected officials.

November 5 - The City Reporter

People in Los Angeles going to the polls, following a sign with an "I Voted" design

California appears to reject Prop. 45

The proposition would have expanded the projects that qualify for a streamlined environmental review, effectively paring down the California Environmental Quality Act.

November 5 - Cal Matters