Studies show building NFL stadiums drain tax revenues and don't boost local economies. What about NFL teams themselves? Land use attorney (and football fan) Bill Adams argues that they rob support from local college teams and local economies.
It's is not impossible for colleges to win or have great attendance with NFL teams next door. It's just harder. That's not good for the college teams, the college's educational and research programs, or the local economies that benefit from the college's presence, argues attorney and football fan Bill Adams.
Using his own city's (San Diego) NCAA and NFL football teams as examples, the latter of which maybe headed to Los Angeles, he cites several studies and articles to make a step by step case that: 1) colleges are important to local economies—much more so than NFL teams; 2) winning college football programs boost the number and quality of new student applications; 3) more and better new student applications result in greater funding and growth of the college; 4) the growth of the college increases the benefit to the local economy; 5) NFL teams compete with local colleges for football fans resulting in diminished attendance at college games; 6) diminished attendance means diminished support for college football; 7) diminished support means diminished success over the long haul; and 8) diminished football success reduces the number and quality of new student applications.
Obviously, a college's football program can still be successful with the NFL in town because a college can be successful without any football program. However, the presence of an NFL team is a negative pressure on a college's football program and, in turn, the college itself. It's an additional obstacle that some programs can overcome and some cannot. Therefore, if you are a football fan who likes both your NFL team and your college team, maybe its time to make a choice.
FULL STORY: Are the NFL Chargers causing the NCAA Aztecs to lose?
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
The state-sanctioned urbicide of Austin
People don’t kill cities. Freeways do.
US to reduce Colorado River water deliveries to Mexico
A new Colorado Treaty amendment reduces Mexico’s Colorado River water allocation by 250,000 acre feet.
5 New England states march closer to 800 megawatt wind energy project
Securing federal approval for the project may be complicated under the Trump administration, which has historically been hostile towards domestic wind power.
Baltimore to break ground on $50 million Transit Priority Project
The project will bring faster bus trips, safer streets and better bike connections to Baltimore.
Airbnb launches $250 million 'last-dollar financing' housing accelerator, makes first investment in Austin
The company will put $6.4 million towards affordable housing development in Texas’ capital.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
Eagle County Government
Harvard University Graduate School of Design
Nashville Planning Department
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
The Pocatello Development Authority
The Urban Renewal Agency of the City of Pocatello
Journal of the American Planning Association