Studies show building NFL stadiums drain tax revenues and don't boost local economies. What about NFL teams themselves? Land use attorney (and football fan) Bill Adams argues that they rob support from local college teams and local economies.
It's is not impossible for colleges to win or have great attendance with NFL teams next door. It's just harder. That's not good for the college teams, the college's educational and research programs, or the local economies that benefit from the college's presence, argues attorney and football fan Bill Adams.
Using his own city's (San Diego) NCAA and NFL football teams as examples, the latter of which maybe headed to Los Angeles, he cites several studies and articles to make a step by step case that: 1) colleges are important to local economies—much more so than NFL teams; 2) winning college football programs boost the number and quality of new student applications; 3) more and better new student applications result in greater funding and growth of the college; 4) the growth of the college increases the benefit to the local economy; 5) NFL teams compete with local colleges for football fans resulting in diminished attendance at college games; 6) diminished attendance means diminished support for college football; 7) diminished support means diminished success over the long haul; and 8) diminished football success reduces the number and quality of new student applications.
Obviously, a college's football program can still be successful with the NFL in town because a college can be successful without any football program. However, the presence of an NFL team is a negative pressure on a college's football program and, in turn, the college itself. It's an additional obstacle that some programs can overcome and some cannot. Therefore, if you are a football fan who likes both your NFL team and your college team, maybe its time to make a choice.
FULL STORY: Are the NFL Chargers causing the NCAA Aztecs to lose?

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

Congressman Proposes Bill to Rename DC Metro “Trump Train”
The Make Autorail Great Again Act would withhold federal funding to the system until the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA), rebrands as the Washington Metropolitan Authority for Greater Access (WMAGA).

The Simple Legislative Tool Transforming Vacant Downtowns
In California, Michigan and Georgia, an easy win is bringing dollars — and delight — back to city centers.

The States Losing Rural Delivery Rooms at an Alarming Pace
In some states, as few as 9% of rural hospitals still deliver babies. As a result, rising pre-term births, no adequate pre-term care and harrowing close calls are a growing reality.

The Small South Asian Republic Going all in on EVs
Thanks to one simple policy change less than five years ago, 65% of new cars in this Himalayan country are now electric.

DC Backpedals on Bike Lane Protection, Swaps Barriers for Paint
Citing aesthetic concerns, the city is removing the concrete barriers and flexposts that once separated Arizona Avenue cyclists from motor vehicles.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Smith Gee Studio
City of Charlotte
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
City of Astoria
Transportation Research & Education Center (TREC) at Portland State University
US High Speed Rail Association
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
Municipality of Princeton (NJ)