A New York Times op-ed predicts that recent changes to Fair Housing could prompt unintended consequences—such as new support for the Republican Party among middle class white populations.
Thomas B. Edsall pens on op-ed arguing that two recent Fair Housing developments will test the allegiance of liberals. The two decisions—a Supreme Court decision to uphold the "Disparate Impact" doctrine and the new "Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing" rule from the Department of Housing and Urban Development—will allow the federal government more authority in implementing the agenda of the Fair Housing Act of 1968.
According to Edsall's argument, the requirements for affluent, "predominantly white" communities to build more low-income and affordable housing "may drive some middle-income and other whites into the arms of the Republican Party." Edsall cites the example of Westchester County in New York, where a 2009 consent decree required 750 units of affordable housing for low-income blacks and Hispanics. Since that controversial decision, voters in this Democratic stronghold have twice elected a Republican as the county executive.
Speculating on the possibility of larger effects beyond the political blowback for Democrats, Edsall goes on to cite a 2007 essay by Robert Putnam in describing isolating and negative effects found in diverse neighborhoods. Finally, Edsall describes the beginning of political machinations by Republicans to capitalize on voter discontent with the recent Fair Housing changes.
Read the full story: Who Will Pay the Political Price for Affordable Housing?
Lessons in Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing
With HUD seeking comments on a revamped version of the Affirmatively Furthering fair Housing Rule, now is a good time to seek lessons from the one state to attempt to implement the federal rule at the state level.
Trump Takes a Final Swipe at the Civil Rights Act
The Department of Justice has proposed a change to the interpretation of disparate impact in Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and many anti-discrimination laws that followed.
Trump Administration Proposal Would Eliminate Fair Housing Protections
The Trump administration last week published its latest attempt to undermine a fair housing rule adopted during the Obama administration.
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour
If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.
Desperate measures: Advocates weigh draining Lake Powell to fill Colorado River
Draining the reservoir could reduce evaporation losses by a couple hundred thousand acre-feet.
US buildings threatened, destroyed by fires set to triple by 2060
Researchers found a high fire risk for socioeconomically vulnerable neighborhoods in the American West.
LA residents may be allowed to paint their own crosswalks
Councilwoman Katy Yaroslavsky put out a motion instructing the Los Angeles Department of Public Transportation to study the feasibility of allowing volunteers to paint crosswalks.
Dallas moves to overhaul its zoning code
The city's zoning reform will allow more multi-family and mixed-use developments.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority