Ask the Ethicist: What to Do When You Hear Internal Alarm Bells

The first in a new series by Planetizen: "Ask the Ethicist," featuring the advice of our resident expert: Carol D. Barrett, FAICP, author of "Everyday Ethics for Practicing Planners."

2 minute read

March 24, 2015, 6:00 AM PDT

By Carol Barrett


Three Wise Mokeys

MichaelMaggs / Wikimedia Commons

"Ask the Ethicist" allows planners to pose tough questions regarding ethical practices in planning to our resident expert: Carol D. Barrett, FAICP, author of Everyday Ethics for Practicing Planners.

Question: I'm a planner in the local city Planning Department. I recently received a communication from one the members of our city's planning commission regarding a property he intends to buy from a family member once a new zoning code amendment goes into effect. Should I report this as a conflict of interest, or is it "business as usual"? 

Carol Barrett: The short answers to the two questions are, in order, "yes" to the conflict of interest and "no" to the business as usual.

In responding in such situations, I always try to give the benefit of the doubt and offer information that will help someone become aware that what they are contemplating is not ethical.

In this case, you already have some sort of relationship with the commissioner because he felt comfortable giving you a call. You can respond with a phone call back that covers some of the basics, such as the requirements under the Fair Political Practices Act to provide an annual list of any property owned (other than a single family home) and the need to refrain from participating in any decision that could directly impact the value of the property. I’d express it in terms like, "You may not have yet had a chance to think about the…"   

Although the property is not yet owned, the right thing to do is for the commissioner to not vote on a rezoning because the purchase is contingent on the outcome of the commission's action. This will protect both the integrity of the commissioner and the entire Planning Commission. I would also document this conversation in a memo to the file. If you are not a supervising planner, then this should also be reviewed with someone higher in the pecking order to protect yourself. My next phone call would be to arrange for some training for the entire Planning Commission on conflicts-of-interest. An ounce of training can help prevent a pound of corruption.

You should always trust that internal alarm that starts ringing when you get these kinds of inquiries. Congratulations to you for heeding the clanging bell. 

[Editor's note: If you have an ethical quandary for consideration, please email [email protected] and include "Ask the Ethicist" in the headline. We will ensure anonymity of all parties. In the meantime, be sure to read the AICP Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct.]


Carol Barrett

Carol Barrett started thinking and writing about ethics the first time she was ordered to do something illegal as a newly minted planning director in 1983. Since then she has spent time researching, writing, and teaching about planning ethics from the point of view of the practicing planner. She is a regular guest speaker at conferences and in classrooms around the country. She identifies "planning ethics" as her hobby when filling out questionnaires.

Young Professional

I love the variety of courses, many practical, and all richly illustrated. They have inspired many ideas that I've applied in practice, and in my own teaching. Mary G., Urban and Environmental Planner

I love the variety of courses, many practical, and all richly illustrated. They have inspired many ideas that I've applied in practice, and in my own teaching.

Mary G., Urban and Environmental Planner

Get top-rated, practical training for planners

"Planetizen federal action tracker" logo superimposed over black and white image of US Capitol dome.

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker

A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

September 16, 2026 - Zachary Whalen

Overlapping highways

The state-sanctioned urbicide of Austin

People don’t kill cities. Freeways do.

September 8, 2026 - Benjamin Schneider

Geese flock to a frozen pond in Aurora, Colorado. There are houses in the background.

Colorado’s Largest Data Center Could Rise Next to Homes — Without a Public Hearing

The proposed campus would consume 11 times the power of Denver International Airport; as it has across the country, opposition mounts.

September 17, 2026 - Capital & Main

The Gross Reservoir, a large body of water surrounded by trees and mountains.

Judges permit Denver to divert 77,000 acre feet from the Colorado River for reservoir expansion

Overuse and climate change have caused the Colorado River’s water levels to plummet.

September 18 - Inside Climate News

Passengers board an Amtrak train under a cloudy sky.

Amtrak, CN end decades-long dispute with eight-year agreement

The new operating agreement establishes an updated framework for the companies to work together, including processes to resolve disputes.

September 18 - Mass Transit

Federal Reserve Chair Kevin Warsh delivers remarks at his swearing-in ceremony in the East Room of the White House.

Raised interest rates may kill financially vulnerable construction projects

The chief economist at ConstructConnect warns that if construction project owners are negatively impacted by the raised rates, it could result in delayed payments to contractors.

September 18 - Construction Dive