The first in a new series by Planetizen: "Ask the Ethicist," featuring the advice of our resident expert: Carol D. Barrett, FAICP, author of "Everyday Ethics for Practicing Planners."
"Ask the Ethicist" allows planners to pose tough questions regarding ethical practices in planning to our resident expert: Carol D. Barrett, FAICP, author of Everyday Ethics for Practicing Planners.
Question: I'm a planner in the local city Planning Department. I recently received a communication from one the members of our city's planning commission regarding a property he intends to buy from a family member once a new zoning code amendment goes into effect. Should I report this as a conflict of interest, or is it "business as usual"?
Carol Barrett: The short answers to the two questions are, in order, "yes" to the conflict of interest and "no" to the business as usual.
In responding in such situations, I always try to give the benefit of the doubt and offer information that will help someone become aware that what they are contemplating is not ethical.
In this case, you already have some sort of relationship with the commissioner because he felt comfortable giving you a call. You can respond with a phone call back that covers some of the basics, such as the requirements under the Fair Political Practices Act to provide an annual list of any property owned (other than a single family home) and the need to refrain from participating in any decision that could directly impact the value of the property. I’d express it in terms like, "You may not have yet had a chance to think about the…"
Although the property is not yet owned, the right thing to do is for the commissioner to not vote on a rezoning because the purchase is contingent on the outcome of the commission's action. This will protect both the integrity of the commissioner and the entire Planning Commission. I would also document this conversation in a memo to the file. If you are not a supervising planner, then this should also be reviewed with someone higher in the pecking order to protect yourself. My next phone call would be to arrange for some training for the entire Planning Commission on conflicts-of-interest. An ounce of training can help prevent a pound of corruption.
You should always trust that internal alarm that starts ringing when you get these kinds of inquiries. Congratulations to you for heeding the clanging bell.
[Editor's note: If you have an ethical quandary for consideration, please email [email protected] and include "Ask the Ethicist" in the headline. We will ensure anonymity of all parties. In the meantime, be sure to read the AICP Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct.]
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
The state-sanctioned urbicide of Austin
People don’t kill cities. Freeways do.
Colorado’s Largest Data Center Could Rise Next to Homes — Without a Public Hearing
The proposed campus would consume 11 times the power of Denver International Airport; as it has across the country, opposition mounts.
Judges permit Denver to divert 77,000 acre feet from the Colorado River for reservoir expansion
Overuse and climate change have caused the Colorado River’s water levels to plummet.
Amtrak, CN end decades-long dispute with eight-year agreement
The new operating agreement establishes an updated framework for the companies to work together, including processes to resolve disputes.
Raised interest rates may kill financially vulnerable construction projects
The chief economist at ConstructConnect warns that if construction project owners are negatively impacted by the raised rates, it could result in delayed payments to contractors.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
KFH Group Inc.
Greater Baltimore Committee
Eagle County Government
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
The Pocatello Development Authority
The Urban Renewal Agency of the City of Pocatello