Planetizen Newswire
Keep up with essential planning news and commentary, delivered to your inbox every Monday and Thursday.
First-Ever Federal Fracking Rules Issued by Interior Department
Despite only applying to Federal lands where a small amount of fracking takes place, energy companies are strongly opposed, perhaps fearing that states without fracking rules could adopt them, which is one of the goals of the Interior Department.
The federal rule-making began three years ago, posted here in 2013. The final rule was filed March 20 in the Federal Register (to be published on March 26). Minutes later, "(t)wo industry groups filed a lawsuit seeking to block the rules in a federal court," write energy reporters Amy Harder and Daniel Gilbert for The Wall Street Journal. "Environmental groups said the rules don’t go far enough."
The trade groups [Independent Petroleum Association of America and Western Energy Alliance] said the new rules are a “reaction to unsubstantiated concerns” and should be thrown out. Interior Department officials said they expect the rules to withstand challenges. [See IPAA's press release].
While only 11 percent of gas and 5 percent of oil fracking takes place on federal, including tribal lands, according to Harder and Gilbert, "states and companies could move to bring their practices in line with the U.S. (rules)." Major "energy-producing states such as Colorado, North Dakota, Pennsylvania and Texas regulate fracking already, there have been no overarching standards."
For environmental groups, the limited disclosure of chemicals used in the fracking process was disappointing. Rather than disclosure to the Interior Department where they would be accessible to the public, "the new rules require companies to publicly disclose chemicals they use through an industry-run website called FracFocus within 30 days of completing the fracking process," write Harder and Gilbert.
“While this proposal has improved from previous versions, it represents a missed opportunity to set a high bar for protections that would truly increase transparency and reduce the impacts,” said Madeleine Foote, legislative representative for the League of Conservation Voters. [See their press release].
Amy Harder explains the new rules in a one-on-one interview with PBS NewsHour's Hari Sreenivasan on Friday's show.
Correspondent's note: Subscriber-only content to The Wall Street Journal article may be available to non-subscribers for up to seven days after March 21.
Full Story:
Published on Friday, March 20, 2015 in
Topics
- 'A Strange, Second-Wave Gentrification' in San Francisco
- Houston Just as Expensive as New York City, Study Says
- Mapping the Land Uses of the United States
- Opportunity Zones Under Investigation by Treasury Inspector General
- The Latest Trend in Redevelopment: Parking Lot to Multi-Family Residential
- Cuomo's LaGuardia AirTrain Plan has a High-Profile Skeptic
- Overcoming the Obstacles of Land Use for Renewable Energy
- U.S. Transit Ridership Growing Again
- Wyoming Legislation Would Add Tolls to Interstate 80
- Future of Massive S.F. Bay Area Housing Project Uncertain Due to Labor Dispute
- Housing Litigation by California Attorney General Yields Results
- Census Information for Rental Property Owners
- Opinion: L.A. Metro Bus Plan Must Put Riders First
- Montreal Vacancies Leave Commercial Corridors Struggling
- Fewer Baby Boomers Choose Urban Lifestyles Than Previous Generations
- A New Transportation Vision for Texas Not Focused on Cars?
- More Space for Buses and Mixed Use Planned for Busy Northern Virginia Corridor
- The World's Streets Are Becoming Less Connected, Study Shows
- The Final Major Holdout in North America Finally Welcomes Uber and Lyft
- Transit Ridership Increases in Anchorage After Decade of Decline
