San Antonio Set to Become Fifth-Largest U.S. City
"San Antonio 'should consider itself lucky,' said Andrew Reschovsky, an annexation expert with the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy in Cambridge, Mass," writes Austin-based reporter Nathan Koppel for The Wall Street Journal. "He said many big cities have been weakened by losing affluent residents—and their taxes—to suburbs, and noted that annexation can be a potent tool for cities to effectively retain some of that population."
San Antonio’s Department of Planning and Community Development has recommended annexing five areas, which total 66 square miles and are located to the north, east and west of the city limits. Most of the areas are in Bexar County.
"A majority of San Antonio’s 10-member city council is expected to vote in favor of annexing some or all of the targeted land," writes Koppel. One exception will be Shirley Gonzales, who believes "San Antonio should focus instead on providing better services to inner-city neighborhoods like the ones she represents."
“When rich people go out into the suburbs that is where the money is,” he said. “You can use that tax revenue to develop the urban core.”
Of course, that's a reason why outlying, unincorporated residents resist annexation.
“No one ever wants to pay more taxes,” said Mamerto Luzarraga, a 47-year-old real estate professional who lives in Alamo Ranch, a large community that could be swallowed up by the city. “One of the selling points of this community is that you live close to city amenities, but you get to pay reduced taxes.”
If the votes goes as expected in 2015 and 2016 to support annexation, it would be the city's sixth annexation since the 1980s according to maps accompanying the article. San Antonio, with 1.4 million residents, is currently the nation's seventh largest city.
Correspondent's note: Subscriber-only content to The Wall Street Journal article will be available to non-subscribers for up to seven days after Dec. 22.