While the neighborhoods on northern segments of the Atlanta's BeltLine has received 94 percent of funding invested towards parks and trails, segments to the south have received 86 percent of affordable housing investments.
A year-old report titled "An Atlanta BeltLine for All: Equitable Development Assessment" [pdf] was recently discussed on SaportaReport by David Pendered. The study was sponsored by the Atlanta BeltLine Partnership, funded by the Ford Foundation, and conducted by Nexus Research Group and Davidson Consulting. According to Pendered, "the Atlanta City Council created the plan in 2008, after public outcry over three significant acquisitions for the BeltLine in and adjacent to northeast Atlanta."
The findings of the report discuss resource allocation and investments made in the trails, parks, general corridor, and affordable housing within the five quadrants of the 22-mile BeltLine project, among other things. In the context of investment, Pendered highlights how "the BeltLine’s southwest area has received 5.5 percent of the total funds invested in BeltLine parks and trails, according to figures in the report. The actual investment is $7 million out of a total investment, as of the date of the report, of $126.8 million."
In addition, there is a vast difference between investment in affordable housing and investment in trails. Of the total $19.2 million invested in trails, "$12.9 million has been invested in the northeast and northside study areas and $6.3 million has been invested in southwest and southeast Atlanta." Indeed, most of the affordable housing is clustered in these southeast and southwest quadrants, 117 units have been funded there out of the total 131 at the time of the report's creation.
Much of the BeltLine's rhetoric has described it as a way to address the historic inequalities that exist in Atlanta along race and class lines.
FULL STORY: Atlanta BeltLine: North gets parks, trails; South gets affordable housing, according to little known report

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

Congressman Proposes Bill to Rename DC Metro “Trump Train”
The Make Autorail Great Again Act would withhold federal funding to the system until the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA), rebrands as the Washington Metropolitan Authority for Greater Access (WMAGA).

The Simple Legislative Tool Transforming Vacant Downtowns
In California, Michigan and Georgia, an easy win is bringing dollars — and delight — back to city centers.

The States Losing Rural Delivery Rooms at an Alarming Pace
In some states, as few as 9% of rural hospitals still deliver babies. As a result, rising pre-term births, no adequate pre-term care and "harrowing" close calls are a growing reality.

The Small South Asian Republic Going all in on EVs
Thanks to one simple policy change less than five years ago, 65% of new cars in this Himalayan country are now electric.

DC Backpedals on Bike Lane Protection, Swaps Barriers for Paint
Citing aesthetic concerns, the city is removing the concrete barriers and flexposts that once separated Arizona Avenue cyclists from motor vehicles.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Smith Gee Studio
City of Charlotte
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
City of Astoria
Transportation Research & Education Center (TREC) at Portland State University
US High Speed Rail Association
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
Municipality of Princeton (NJ)