A group that coined the term, "stack and pack" to deride density and its role in reducing carbon emissions lost in court when the judge rejected their argument that only technological improvements in cars and fuels were necessary to reduce emissions.

The lawsuit was one of four challenging Plan Bay Area, the regional plan approved by the Association of Bay Area Counties (ABAG) and the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) last July to meet the requirements of the landmark climate change law of 2008, SB 375, that aims to reduce carbon emissions through improved land use and transportation investments.
"Bay Area Citizens, represented by the conservative Pacific Legal Foundation (PLF), filed the suit in August [posted here.] The group argued the plan was unneeded because California laws reducing the carbon content of fuels and requiring cars and trucks to get better gas mileage would lower greenhouse gas emissions," writes Bob Egelko of the San Francisco Chronicle.
But Alameda County Superior Court Judge Evelio Grillo said Wednesday (July 2) that a 2007 [sic] state law required the agencies to develop a plan that would meet greenhouse gas-reduction targets on its own, without considering the impact of the fuel laws.
In a PLF Liberty Blog, the attorney who argued the case, Jonathan Wood, wrote, "The Citizens oppose the Plan because it’s unnecessary to achieve the environmental goals of S.B. 375 and will likely end up forcing people to live in dense “stack and pack” housing, denying them the American dream of the single family home."
Grillo agreed with the arguments made by ABAG and MTC "that failing to adopt a regional housing and transit plan, as Bay Area Citizens proposed, 'would result in less residential and employment density, which would result in less transit ridership, greater vehicle delay generally, and greater congested vehicle miles per capita.'"
As a result, he said, the agencies found they would be unable to meet emissions-reduction goals set by the state Air Resources Board.
As we previously noted, environmentalists settled their Plan Bay Area lawsuit in June; the Building Industry Association of the Bay Area dropped its lawsuit in March, leaving only Post Sustainability Institute's lawsuit challenging Plan Bay Area, plus the appeal that Bay Area Citizens will file, according to Wood.
FULL STORY: Judge rejects challenge to Bay Area land-use, transit plan

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

Maui's Vacation Rental Debate Turns Ugly
Verbal attacks, misinformation campaigns and fistfights plague a high-stakes debate to convert thousands of vacation rentals into long-term housing.

Restaurant Patios Were a Pandemic Win — Why Were They so Hard to Keep?
Social distancing requirements and changes in travel patterns prompted cities to pilot new uses for street and sidewalk space. Then it got complicated.

In California Battle of Housing vs. Environment, Housing Just Won
A new state law significantly limits the power of CEQA, an environmental review law that served as a powerful tool for blocking new development.

Boulder Eliminates Parking Minimums Citywide
Officials estimate the cost of building a single underground parking space at up to $100,000.

Orange County, Florida Adopts Largest US “Sprawl Repair” Code
The ‘Orange Code’ seeks to rectify decades of sprawl-inducing, car-oriented development.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Heyer Gruel & Associates PA
JM Goldson LLC
Custer County Colorado
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
City of Astoria
Transportation Research & Education Center (TREC) at Portland State University
Jefferson Parish Government
Camden Redevelopment Agency
City of Claremont