A group that coined the term, "stack and pack" to deride density and its role in reducing carbon emissions lost in court when the judge rejected their argument that only technological improvements in cars and fuels were necessary to reduce emissions.
The lawsuit was one of four challenging Plan Bay Area, the regional plan approved by the Association of Bay Area Counties (ABAG) and the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) last July to meet the requirements of the landmark climate change law of 2008, SB 375, that aims to reduce carbon emissions through improved land use and transportation investments.
"Bay Area Citizens, represented by the conservative Pacific Legal Foundation (PLF), filed the suit in August [posted here.] The group argued the plan was unneeded because California laws reducing the carbon content of fuels and requiring cars and trucks to get better gas mileage would lower greenhouse gas emissions," writes Bob Egelko of the San Francisco Chronicle.
But Alameda County Superior Court Judge Evelio Grillo said Wednesday (July 2) that a 2007 [sic] state law required the agencies to develop a plan that would meet greenhouse gas-reduction targets on its own, without considering the impact of the fuel laws.
In a PLF Liberty Blog, the attorney who argued the case, Jonathan Wood, wrote, "The Citizens oppose the Plan because it’s unnecessary to achieve the environmental goals of S.B. 375 and will likely end up forcing people to live in dense “stack and pack” housing, denying them the American dream of the single family home."
Grillo agreed with the arguments made by ABAG and MTC "that failing to adopt a regional housing and transit plan, as Bay Area Citizens proposed, 'would result in less residential and employment density, which would result in less transit ridership, greater vehicle delay generally, and greater congested vehicle miles per capita.'"
As a result, he said, the agencies found they would be unable to meet emissions-reduction goals set by the state Air Resources Board.
As we previously noted, environmentalists settled their Plan Bay Area lawsuit in June; the Building Industry Association of the Bay Area dropped its lawsuit in March, leaving only Post Sustainability Institute's lawsuit challenging Plan Bay Area, plus the appeal that Bay Area Citizens will file, according to Wood.
FULL STORY: Judge rejects challenge to Bay Area land-use, transit plan
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
Chicago’s Ghost Rails
Just beneath the surface of the modern city lie the remnants of its expansive early 20th-century streetcar system.
Amtrak Cutting Jobs, Funding to High-Speed Rail
The agency plans to cut 10 percent of its workforce and has confirmed it will not fund new high-speed rail projects.
Ohio Forces Data Centers to Prepay for Power
Utilities are calling on states to hold data center operators responsible for new energy demands to prevent leaving consumers on the hook for their bills.
MARTA CEO Steps Down Amid Citizenship Concerns
MARTA’s board announced Thursday that its chief, who is from Canada, is resigning due to questions about his immigration status.
Silicon Valley ‘Bike Superhighway’ Awarded $14M State Grant
A Caltrans grant brings the 10-mile Central Bikeway project connecting Santa Clara and East San Jose closer to fruition.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Caltrans
City of Fort Worth
Mpact (founded as Rail~Volution)
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
City of Astoria
City of Portland
City of Laramie