Senator Steinberg's CEQA reform bill, SB 731, which we have been following all year, died - but many of the most important aspects - LOS, aesthetic and parking impacts, have been transferred to SB 743 (Kings Arena bill), though applied more narrowly.
As we noted on Monday, SB 743, the Sacramento arena bill, passed the legislature on Thursday (Sept. 12). Earlier that day, key elements of SB 731, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Modernization Act of 2013, were added, but applied on a more limited scope. Both bills were authored by Senate President pro Tem Darrell Steinberg. Damien Newton explains.
While SB 731 would have brought the statewide elimination of [Level-of-Service] LOS — a car-centric transportation planning metric that basically puts the movement of cars over everything else — as part of environmental review, SB 743 would still nix the metric for projects within designated transit priority areas (TPAs).
SB 743 goes further than just eliminating LOS for these "urban infill areas", as both of Steinberg's press releases on CEQA modernization note:
Removing parking and aesthetics standards as grounds for legal challenges against project developments in urban infill areas. These standards are most commonly used as CEQA litigation hooks to slow or terminate a new development project. The standards will remain in place to demand a higher threshold for green-field developments.
However, the most recent addition of requiring a "socioeconomic impact of infill development", described here last Thursday (Sept. 12) is no longer in the bill.
So why the change - why not just keep CEQA reform and CEQA exemption for the Kings Arena as separate bills? Justin Ewers of California Forward, writes (in the California Economic Summit) that it was a result of a "Wednesday (Sept. 11) evening meeting between Steinberg and the governor".
Insiders say the governor pushed the Senate leader to pick one CEQA bill to get behind this legislative session, and Steinberg chose the Kings arena, putting his statewide legislation on hold until next year. Steinberg also reportedly promised to add several provisions requested by the governor.
Is it no wonder that some compare lawmaking to sausage making? Oh, did I neglect to mention that the arena bill is the result of a "gut-and-amend" on Sept. 6 to a bill originally titled, "Electricity: rates"?
Read the full story: New “Kings Arena” CEQA Bill Would Still Nix LOS in “Transit Priority Areas”
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour
If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.
Desperate measures: Advocates weigh draining Lake Powell to fill Colorado River
Draining the reservoir could reduce evaporation losses by a couple hundred thousand acre-feet.
Mamdani’s pied-à-terre tax survives legal challenge
A panel of judges found that the plaintiffs failed to demonstrate injury as a result of New York City's implementation of the tax.
Eastern Nebraska is running out of electricity
Data centers and electrification are straining eastern Nebraska’s grid, throttling economic development.
Seattle passes record-breaking transit services expansion
Proposition 1 will double the city’s transit tax to add 95,000 more bus trips and preserve 180,000 bus trips annually.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
University of Michigan School for Environment and Sustainability (SEAS)
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority