A new study from the Tax Foundation starts with the premise that user fees - gas taxes and tolls, should pay for road funding. All 50 states are evaluated to see the greatest percentage of user fees. Delaware is rated first; Alaska and Wyoming last.
Joseph Henchman, attorney and policy analyst for the Tax Foundation, writes that the "lion’s share of transportation funding should come from user taxes and fees, such as tolls, gasoline taxes, and other user-related charges. When road funding comes from a mix of tolls and gas taxes, the people that use the roads benefit from them and should bear a sizeable portion of the cost."
Henchman includes a table showing the share of road spending derived from all user fees, though primarily gas taxes and tolls, for each state, and another column that includes all transportation spending, i.e. including public transit.
Each state is ranked according to the percentage of user fees paying for roads and another rank for all transportation programs, including transit.
Delaware and Florida are ranked first and second, respectively while Alaska and Wyoming ranked 50 and 49, respectively.
In total for the nation, "highway user taxes and fees made up just 32 percent of state and local expenses on roads; (t)he rest was financed out of general revenues, including federal aid", Henchman writes.
When states have a very low percentage of transportation funding coming from user fees, like Alaska and Wyoming, with mostly general revenue used to maintain the roads, the perception is that they are "free, and consequently, overused or congested—often the precise problem transportation spending programs are meant to solve.
Henchman's recommendations:
- "Expanding tolls and indexing gasoline taxes for inflation may not be politically popular even though transportation facilities and services are highly popular.
- Given that transportation spending exists, states should aim to fund as much of it as possible from user-related taxes and fees.
- Subsidizing highway spending from general revenues creates pressure to increase income or sales taxes, which can be unfair to non-users and undermine economic growth for the state as a whole."
The study did not make any recommendations regarding vehicle-miles-traveled fees, though there are references to VMT fees in the footnotes.
Undoubtedly, Virginia, ranked #20 on the study with a 20.2-cent gas tax on the Tax Foundation map (but 17.5-cent tax on Gas Buddy) would drop toward the bottom of the list if it were to adopt Gov. Bob McDonnell's plan to eliminate the state gas tax and replace it with a general sales tax. Alaska and Wyoming have an 8-cent and 14-cent gas tax, respectively; the lowest in the nation. However, Virginia's road tolls might prevent it from being ranked dead last.
To show how significantly road tolls and other user fees fit into the Tax Foundation's study, look at California - ranked #3 in level of gas tax (i.e the third highest in the nation at 50.9 cents) but #38 in the study. Dan Walters explains in his Sacramento Bee/Capitol Alert blog, "California high on gas tax, low on user-financed transportation":
California has the nation's third highest fuel taxes, but nevertheless has one of the nation's lowest rates of charging users for highways and other transportation services, according to a new study by the Tax Foundation.
Read the full story: Gasoline Taxes and Tolls Pay for Only a Third of State and Local Road Spending
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour
If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.
Desperate measures: Advocates weigh draining Lake Powell to fill Colorado River
Draining the reservoir could reduce evaporation losses by a couple hundred thousand acre-feet.
Chicago voters approve permanent festival grounds, penalty for vacant property owners
Currently, major summer and fall festivals take over public parks for weeks at a time, drawing criticism from nearby residents
NYC votes to cut outdoor dining red tape, speed up permitting
New York City also voted to allow the Department of Transportation to begin work on urgent projects before notifying elected officials.
California appears to reject Prop. 45
The proposition would have expanded the projects that qualify for a streamlined environmental review, effectively paring down the California Environmental Quality Act.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority