Hold off on Zipcar’s Eulogy: Planners are Key to Carsharing’s Next Act

The recent purchase of Zipcar by Avis is just the latest sign that carsharing is in a period of flux. As shared-mobility evolves in the next few years, planners can play a crucial role in ensuring that the industry serves those in need of alternatives to car ownership, generates revenues for municipalities, integrates with public transportation, and delivers wider benefits.

4 minute read

January 14, 2013, 2:26 PM PST

By Scott Le Vine @http://www.twitter.com/scottericlevine

The news that Avis is buying Zipcar is cause for alarm to some – won’t a plodding conglomerate simply smother the innovation and creativity that brought carsharing from promising concept to a thriving industry with a million-plus members?  Since when did a car rental company care about sustainability, or doing well by their customers, or indeed anything but making a quick buck?

But now’s not the time for eulogies.  Carsharing is in a period of flux, and events are moving rapidly.  As Zipcar’s long-deposed co-founder puts it: this is “part of the transition to the future”. And planners will be key to this transition.

So let’s look at two important questions:  1) What’s the big picture here?, and 2) What exactly is the role for planners?

First, carsharing and car rental are not nearly as distinct as some carsharing proponents argue.  Carsharing is by the hour, no?  Well there’s nothing to stop car rental firms from more sophisticated pricing.  But carsharing has members while rental has just customers, right? Not in Switzerland, birthplace of carsharing, where you can use it on a one-off basis with no subscription – which sounds an awful lot like car rental.  I’m not the only one that has trouble drawing a line between them: research by Joe Schwieterman shows that carsharing sometimes inadvertently gets caught up in taxes on car rental (visitors don’t vote, right?) with eye-watering tax rates the unintended consequence.

The rental industry sees carsharing as a natural evolution of their business: the application of new business practices, enabled by networked mobile computing, to an old need.  They were sponsoring early carsharing pilot projects back when today’s Zipsters were in diapers.   Avis, in public, has been studiously un-interested in carsharing until now – but not so regarding the possibilities of ‘virtual car rental’.

Car rental firms see policies that support carsharing as one-sided, and they may have a point: Research for the British rental industry body (BVRLA), by my colleague Sally Cairns, due out in the next few months, is expected to show that car rental can provide distinct sustainability benefits, in similar ways as carsharing, not least by enabling some users to own fewer cars than they otherwise would. 

And let’s not forget: carsharing is changing in other important ways as well – and Zipcar had arguably fallen a step behind, a judgment supported by its sliding share price. There will of course be important segments of the carsharing market that can’t be efficiently served by Avis-Zipcar or Hertz, but in the next few years the line between carsharing and car rental will become ever less distinct.  No one quite knows how to make real money in carsharing right now, but the big car renters don’t want to be the next Kodak, watching in blissful ignorance while photography went digital.

But what is the role for planners?

Carsharing doesn’t exist in a vacuum, and place matters – greatly.  Whichever ways shared-mobility evolves in the next few years, it will continue to depend on privileged access to public street space in very specific places and under very particular terms.  Shared-mobility hinges on public sector buy-in; the industry knows this & acts accordingly.  It can’t reach its market without planners helping – and letting – them.  In 2013 planners will need to take off the kid gloves, now that in many cases we’re dealing with serious businesses (and ones that can look after themselves, thank you very much).  In Zipcar, Avis is buying a sort of public trust, and planners will be responsible for seeing that they are a good steward.

The question for planners to reflect on, then, is what are reasonable policy objectives to pursue.  A few of my suggestions:

  1. Fairness: Planners should ensure these services reach those most in need, and who have the most to benefit by avoiding the fixed costs of car ownership.  Not having a credit card or bank account shouldn’t be a barrier.  Also, big changes are taking place now in how young adults travel; there is an opportunity to encourage operators to take on young drivers as they become licensed, starting them on ‘judicious automobility’ right off the bat.  Emerging technologies can help manage the risks.
  2. Wider benefits: Reductions in emissions, traffic levels and parking needs are possible – but planners will need to bear in mind these are not the only goals worth achieving, and that impacts are likely to change over time.  It will take many years to fully understand the impacts.
  3. Revenue: The market can support, in places, payments for permits-to-park of thousands of dollars per shared-car per year.  In a time of austerity such a new stream of revenue can help meet planning objectives. 
  4. Integration with public transportation: Carsharing tends to be used quite infrequently, and can thus be complementary with public transportation, bicycling and walking.  There are major opportunities for joint ticketing, last-mile solutions, etc. that planners hold the keys to.

Critically, planners will need to keep towns and cities from signing long-term contracts with operators while technologies and services are evolving rapidly.  (Washington DC’s four generations of parking deals in the 2000s are instructive.)  Flexibility and room for maneuver will continue to be essential policy instruments for planners in this time of change, as we seek to ensure the public interest gets a fair shake.

Scott Le Vine

Scott Le Vine, AICP is an Assistant Professor (Urban Planning) at the State University of New York (New Paltz), a Research Associate at Imperial College London, and a Visiting Professor at Southwest Jiaotong University (Chengdu, China).

Aerial view of snowy single-family homes in suburban Long Island, New York

New York Governor Advances Housing Plan Amid Stiff Suburban Opposition

Governor Kathy Hochul’s ambitious proposal to create more housing has once again run into a brick wall of opposition in New York’s enormous suburbs, especially on Long Island. This year, however, the wall may have some cracks.

March 20, 2023 - Mark H. McNulty

Yellow on black "Expect Delays" traffic sign

A Serious Critique of Congestion Costs and Induced Vehicle Travel Impacts

Some highway advocates continue to claim that roadway expansions are justified to reduce traffic congestion. That's not what the research shows. It's time to stop obsessing over congestion and instead strive for efficient accessibility.

March 14, 2023 - Todd Litman

Empty parking garage at night with yellow lines marking spots and fluorescent lighting

Rethinking the Role of Parking in the American City

In cities big and small, the tide is turning against sprawling parking lots, car-centric development, and minimum parking mandates.

March 16, 2023 - The New York Times


Mapping Sidewalks for Improved Connectivity

A new tool uses aerial image recognition to map a city’s sidewalks and crosswalks. Its developers hope it will aid in creating a more comprehensive understanding of pedestrian networks and where improvements are needed.

3 hours ago - MIT News

A light rail train waits at the Downtown Long Beach station with a sign that reads “Long Beach” to declare its route to riders.

Long Beach Residents Oppose Proposed Homeless Services Hub Near Rail Terminus

L.A. Metro’s “end-of-the-line” policy forces people experiencing homeless off transit every night at the same time and location. A proposed hub would provide services a few stops before the end of the line in Long Beach.

4 hours ago - Long Beach Post

A hypothetical map of the state of Idaho, expanded by annexing a large portion fo Oregon. The map is emblazoned with the words “Greater Idaho.”

The Nation's Most Advanced Secessionist Movement

Legislation supporting the Greater Idaho Movement, which would annex over half of neighboring Oregon, has advanced in the Idaho legislature.

5 hours ago - FOX News

Planner II

City of Greenville

Planner I

City of Greenville

Rural Projects Coordinator (RARE AmeriCorps Member)

Resource Assistance for Rural Environments (RARE) AmeriCorps Program

New Updates on PD&R Edge

HUD's Office of Policy Development and Research

HUD’s 2023 Innovative Housing Showcase

HUD's Office of Policy Development and Research

Write for Planetizen

Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools

This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.

Planning for Universal Design

Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.