After a much heralded vote on July 6 in the state Senate, the embattled CA high-speed rail project is now eligible to receive $7.9 billion in state and federal funds, but formidable obstacles remain, not the least of which is finding $60 billion.
In light of last week's milestone vote to approve the issuance of $4.6 billion in state bond funds, the rhetoric supporting and spurning California's high-speed rail project has exploded across the Internet.
Pointing to uncertainties over future funding and pending litigation, particularly in the Central Valley where farmers are organizing to halt the looming train project, Jim Carlton and Max Taves report in The Wall Street Journal that it may be premature to celebrate the advancement of the country's costliest infrastructure project.
"The farm bureaus in Merced and Madera counties (in the Central Valley) in June filed suit in state Superior Court in Sacramento asking a judge to nullify an environmental-impact report the rail authority certified as one of the final steps toward breaking ground on a 60-mile stretch between Merced and Fresno. Among their concerns: that the rail line would disrupt about 1,500 acres of farmland by cutting off irrigation canals and generating too much wind from passing trains for bee pollination."
"Dan Richard, chairman of the rail authority, said the project would minimize disruption to farms but added that far less land would be taken away from agriculture than has happened from urban development by cities like Fresno."
"The other challenge, longer term, is fully funding a project that is estimated to cost $68.4 billion, rail observers say. Congressional Republicans have already expressed resistance in funding high-speed rail across the country, while some California politicians on both sides of the aisle question if the cash-strapped state can keep coming up with money to match federal funds.
In his floor speech Friday against the funding bill, Democratic state Sen. Joe Simitian said the money being allocated represents a fraction of what the state would have to put up over time. "We're expected to put up 20 times that over the course of who knows how many years," said Mr. Simitian, who was one of four Democrats to vote against the bill."
Also in the Wall Street Journal, Political Diary writer Allysia Finley suggests that Bay Area and Los Angeles region senators were bought off with "$2 billion of funding for regional rail projects, including $700 million to bail out, er, modernize Silicon Valley's insolvent Caltrain."
Meanwhile, in The Atlantic Cities, Eric Jaffe rebuffs the argument made by project detractors that no one will ride the train once it's completed. Jaffe points to examples of high-speed rail driven travel demand from around the world that he argues bodes well for California's potential ridership.
And in The Architect's Newspaper, David Herd delivers his full-throated backing of the project, asserting that, "high-speed rail presents a critical opportunity for California, one that will catalyze an economically, socially, and ecologically vital future for the state."
Editor's note: Links to Wall Street Journal may be time-limited without subscription.
Thanks to The Roundup
FULL STORY: For Now, Bullet Train May Go Nowhere
Depopulation Patterns Get Weird
A recent ranking of “declining” cities heavily features some of the most expensive cities in the country — including New York City and a half-dozen in the San Francisco Bay Area.
California Exodus: Population Drops Below 39 Million
Never mind the 40 million that demographers predicted the Golden State would reach by 2018. The state's population dipped below 39 million to 38.965 million last July, according to Census data released in March, the lowest since 2015.
Chicago to Turn High-Rise Offices into Housing
Four commercial buildings in the Chicago Loop have been approved for redevelopment into housing in a bid to revitalize the city’s downtown post-pandemic.
How California Transit Agencies are Addressing Rider Harassment
Safety and harassment are commonly cited reasons passengers, particularly women and girls, avoid public transit.
Significant Investments Needed to Protect LA County Residents From Climate Hazards
A new study estimates that LA County must invest billions of dollars before 2040 to protect residents from extreme heat, increasing precipitation, worsening wildfires, rising sea levels, and climate-induced public health threats.
Federal Rule Raises Cost for Oil and Gas Extraction on Public Lands
An update to federal regulations raises minimum bonding to limit orphaned wells and ensure cleanup costs are covered — but it still may not be enough to mitigate the damages caused by oil and gas drilling.
City of Costa Mesa
Licking County
Barrett Planning Group LLC
HUD's Office of Policy Development and Research
Mpact Transit + Community
HUD's Office of Policy Development and Research
City of Universal City TX
ULI Northwest Arkansas
Town of Zionsville
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.