What's Really Keeping Americans off of Transit?

Josh Barro offers his take on the charge, oft resorted to by transit advocates, that subsidies for road maintenance encourage driving. Instead, he argues, we should turn our attention to the mechanisms that make it hard for transit to compete.

2 minute read

July 3, 2012, 2:00 PM PDT

By Ryan Lue


For anyone interested in changing to status quo, it can help to take a closer look at the things we don't even realize we're paying for. In that tradition, transit advocates have made remarkable headway in recent years, identifying subsidies that the general public pays to make it easier to get around on four wheels. From free parking to road repair, cities go to great lengths to clear obstacles for the automobile.

But Barro offers a sobering rebuttal for those who argue that such incentives are standing in the way of the widespread acceptance of transit: between public transit and the automobile, the former depends far more heavily on general subsidies than the latter. In his estimation, only 8 percent of the overall cost of driving is subsidized by general revenue (i.e. not just drivers), whereas transit systems in Milwaukee and Madison, for instance, rely on such subsidies for 65 to 74 percent of their budgets.

"If you ended road subsidies," Barro offers, "people would drive
less – but probably not much less. Gasoline prices would go up by about
50 to 60 cents a gallon, but over the last decade, fuel prices rose
more sharply than that without triggering any major change in our
transportation practices."

The real battle for transit advocates, then, boils down to land use: "Cities impose barriers to density that limit the number of housing units
and offices that can be located near buses and trains, which reduces
mass-transit usage."

Thursday, June 14, 2012 in The Washington Examiner

"Planetizen federal action tracker" logo superimposed over black and white image of US Capitol dome.

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker

A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

October 28, 2026 - Zachary Whalen

A car drives through a puddle, making a large splash. Rain pours down.

California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour

If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.

October 28, 2026 - Grist

Lake Powell with much of the water evaporated.

Desperate measures: Advocates weigh draining Lake Powell to fill Colorado River

Draining the reservoir could reduce evaporation losses by a couple hundred thousand acre-feet.

October 30, 2026 - Yale Environment 360

Nithya Ramen talks to an older man. She is smiling and wearing a yellow dress. They are both outside.

Los Angeles just elected an urban planner as its mayor

Transportation analysts are optimistic that Raman will be more aggressive in addressing transit issues than Bass.

November 7 - Los Angeles Times

Mamdani behind a microphone, in front of a snowbank

Mamdani’s pied-à-terre tax survives legal challenge

A panel of judges found that the plaintiffs failed to demonstrate injury as a result of New York City's implementation of the tax.

November 6 - CNN

A road in north eastern Nebraska with power lines on either side, and grassy fields.

Eastern Nebraska is running out of electricity

Data centers and electrification are straining eastern Nebraska’s grid, throttling economic development.

November 6 - Grist

FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?

After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.

Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold

The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.