Perhaps no American city is as defined by a single architectural style as Washington D.C. is by classically inspired architecture. Roger K. Lewis argues why the nation's capital needs to break from its historical antecedents.
Recent debates over Frank Gehry's non-traditional design for a memorial to Dwight Eisenhower have brought back to life a simmering debate over the "appropriate" architectural style for D.C., which is of course defined by classically styled government and civic edifices such as the U.S.
Capitol and White House; the Supreme Court; Union Station; the National
Gallery of Art West Building; the Lincoln and Jefferson memorials; and
the Federal Triangle. Leading the charge against Gehry has been the Washington-based National Civic Art Society, who are "dedicated to the traditional, humanistic practice of architecture,
urban design and the fine arts, advocating the humanist tradition as the
unrivaled source of artistic forms and conventions."
"People presumably associate classicism with stability, permanence,
authority, elegance and grandeur," observes Lewis, but "National Civic Art Society members
believe that modern architecture is devoid of these attributes. Thus, the society argues that Washington has been and should continue to be a city of classically inspired architecture."
Rather than looking at the debate around D.C.'s architecture as an either/or proposition between modernism and classicism, Lewis argues that architecture's 20th century transformation has allowed both to co-exist.
"In the 20th century, architecture underwent dramatic transformation.
Innovative materials, machines and construction methods appeared.
Unprecedented functional needs and building types emerged. New
technologies and building systems were devised, enabling architects and
engineers to address new physical, environmental, social and economic
challenges unknown in past centuries. This is why so-called modernism
encompasses so many styles, and why formulaic, one-size-fits-all
classicism makes little sense and has less meaning today."
"Most Americans, including architects, appreciate historic
architecture and are committed to its preservation. But I doubt that
many want or expect 21st-century architecture to look like it was
transplanted from the past."
Read the full story: Why classical architecture makes little sense for today’s Washington
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour
If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.
Chicago breaks ground on $3 billion megadevelopment
The new neighborhood, titled Foundry Park, will one day host 3,700 residences.
California High-Speed Rail Authority CEO resigns after $600,000 scandal
Under Ian Choudri, the authority used taxpayer dollars to fund first class flights and trips to nightclubs.
Want to study the Missouri River? Soon, you may need unanimous approval from 10 states
Legislation would require 10 governors’ permission to study or build projects moving water outside the basin.
Desperate measures: Advocates weigh draining Lake Powell to fill Colorado River
Draining the reservoir could reduce evaporation losses by a couple hundred thousand acre-feet.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority