More Cities Are Misapplying Eminent Domain

Courts question the use of eminent domain to simply transfer property to another private owner.

1 minute read

July 25, 2001, 8:00 AM PDT

"Under the right of eminent domain, a government can take private property for 'a public use,' the U.S. Constitution's standard for all takings. Cities, however, have increasingly used their power of eminent domain to transfer property from one business to another in the name of redevelopment, and they have done this by stretching the definition of a public use to include everything from bridges and highways to speedways, casinos and BMW dealers." In a series of cases, U.S. courts are ruling that this expanded use of eminent domain exceeds the intended purpose. Is this a backlash against eminent domain?

Thanks to Irene Sherr

FULL STORY: More Courts Rule Cities Misapply Eminent Domain

Monday, July 23, 2001 in Wall St. Journal

Housing United States

I love the variety of courses, many practical, and all richly illustrated. They have inspired many ideas that I've applied in practice, and in my own teaching. Mary G., Urban and Environmental Planner

I love the variety of courses, many practical, and all richly illustrated. They have inspired many ideas that I've applied in practice, and in my own teaching.

Mary G., Urban and Environmental Planner

Get top-rated, practical training for planners

Start Learning

Advertise with us

FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?

After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.