The California Supreme Court ruled against the university in a battle over a proposed enrollment cap, forcing the school to reject thousands of potential new students.
After a legal battle over a proposed hike in enrollment, the University of California, Berkeley will be forced to cut enrollment by roughly 3,000 students in the coming fall. Nanette Asimov and Bob Egelko report on the saga, which began when a neighborhood group sued on the grounds that the university did not conduct the appropriate Environmental Impact Review (EIR) for its proposed expansion.
In August, Superior Court Judge Brad Seligman ordered the campus to cap enrollment at 42,237 — the fall 2020 number — and to halt construction of its Upper Hearst project at 2698 Hearst Ave.: two buildings intended to house professors and add classrooms for the Goldman School of Public Policy. Neighbors had argued that the university failed to properly plan for the increased noise, traffic and other quality-of-life problems the project would bring.
Save Berkeley's Neighborhoods, the group that brought the lawsuit, says it does not want to stop the university's projects altogether, but rather to ensure the university conducts an adequate analysis of potential impacts. "On a 4-2 vote, in a one-sentence order without further comment, the court refused to lift the enrollment freeze ordered by an Alameda County judge and denied review of an appellate ruling requiring the university to conduct further environmental review of an off-campus construction project while it limits incoming enrollment."
The article details the lawsuit and subsequent appeals, which culminated on March 3 with the California Supreme Court decision.
A proposed state bill making its way through the California legislature would exempt public universities from CEQA requirements, which could prevent future battles similar to this one.
FULL STORY: UC Berkeley must withhold thousands of acceptance letters after state Supreme Court ruling
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
The state-sanctioned urbicide of Austin
People don’t kill cities. Freeways do.
US to reduce Colorado River water deliveries to Mexico
A new Colorado Treaty amendment reduces Mexico’s Colorado River water allocation by 250,000 acre feet.
Mamdani overhauls NYC's Vision Zero plan with 100 new policy goals
The overhaul aims to reduce traffic deaths and make streets safer for pedestrians, cyclists and drivers through lower speed limits, new safety infrastructure and more.
Amtrak not solely to blame for New Jersey commuter rail's unreliability, report finds
A new study from the Garden State Initiative found that NJ Transit’s budget grew 20% across a 4 year period, but reliability declined significantly over the same period.
EPA erases limits on planet-warming pollution from power plants
Under Monday’s plan, power plants would still have some limits on how much mercury, arsenic and other contaminants they can emit.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
Eagle County Government
Harvard University Graduate School of Design
Nashville Planning Department
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
The Pocatello Development Authority
The Urban Renewal Agency of the City of Pocatello
Journal of the American Planning Association