IndyGo transit officials are required to match transit income tax revenue with funding from private sources, but haven't yet met that end of the bargain. A new state law would hold IndyGo accountable to those requirements.
"The Indiana Senate voted Thursday [February 27] to put teeth in a 2014 state law that required IndyGo to raise private dollars to help finance its mass transit operations, including the Red Line—something it has not done to date," reports Lesley Weidenbener.
"IndyGo officials say the legislation—which still requires final votes in the House and Senate—could significantly jeopardize its operations and its ability to build the planned Blue and Purple rapid transit lines," according to Weidenbener.
A 2014 law that, according to Weidenbener, "authorized a 0.25-percentage-point increase in the city’s income tax rate to fund IndyGo operations and new services," is the source of the controversy. That law required IndyGo to provide a 10 percent match of tax revenue with funding from private sources.
"The tax went into effect in October 2017 and is generating about $60 million per year. [State Senator Aaron] Freeman said that means IndyGo would need to raise about $6 million per year to meet the law’s threshold, but the agency has so far not raised any private money," according to Weidenbener. The 2014 law didn't include penalties if the city failed to meet that requirement, so the law proposed by Freeman last week would "require the state to withhold 10% of IndyGo’s local income tax revenue in years that it failed to meet the private funding threshold," according to Weidenbener.
Planetizen documented some of the long process of the city's adoption of the transit income tax, from approval by voters, to implementation delays and eventual approval by the City Council, to initial ridership success and ambitious plans enabled by the new revenue stream.
Read the full story: Bill could strip IndyGo of millions of dollars, halt future work on Purple, Blue lines
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour
If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.
Desperate measures: Advocates weigh draining Lake Powell to fill Colorado River
Draining the reservoir could reduce evaporation losses by a couple hundred thousand acre-feet.
Housing is the top priority of Seattle’s sole new councilmember
Jenks campaigned on building 1,000 new units of affordable housing.
New tax cuts may slash $1.5 billion in funding for Miami transit, public parks
Amendment 3 will save Miami-Dade homeowners $2,700 in 2028.
Arizona, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania hope to finally advance climate goals post-midterms
The three states have spent years under Republican or divided control.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
University of Michigan School for Environment and Sustainability (SEAS)
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority