A couple of questions are fundamental to the debate about the housing affordability crisis.

[Updated: August 19, 2019]
An article by Solomon Greene raises the question of whether deregulation can solve the affordable housing crisis, and, more specifically, whether the federal government can play a hand in that deregulation.
The Trump administration is making at least initial gestures toward trying to do just that. In June, President Donald Trump signed an executive order establishing the "White House Council on Eliminating Regulatory Barriers to Affordable Housing." Democratic candidates for president are also pushing for fewer regulations as one tool for combating the rising costs of housing. The New York Times Editorial Board yesterday announced its support published an editorial supporting the idea of more construction as one potential solution to housing affordability.
"This embrace of deregulation merits particular praise because the states most resistant to allowing housing construction are the strongholds of the Democratic Party, in the Northeast and along the Pacific Coast, and the most resistant voters are the wealthy residents of those states who provide so much of the funding for Democratic presidential campaigns," according to the editorial.
Returning to the earlier article, Solomon builds a case that the federal government has multiple avenues by which it can influence the housing market, including subsidies, ending or prohibiting exclusionary barriers, identifying the helpful regulations among the harmful, and supporting bottom-up initiatives. On that last point, Solomon writes:
Effective policies will also require a strong emphasis on community engagement from the outset, and ongoing monitoring of implementation and evaluation of outcomes. The federal government used this model under the Sustainable Communities Initiative and began to apply it more broadly through the US Department of Housing and Urban Development’s Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing rule before Secretary Carson suspended its implementation. Mining lessons from each of these efforts will be key to the success of new initiatives.
FULL STORY: Can We Deregulate Ourselves out of the Affordable Housing Crisis?

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

USGS Water Science Centers Targeted for Closure
If their work is suspended, states could lose a valuable resource for monitoring, understanding, and managing water resources.

End Human Sacrifices to the Demanding Gods of Automobile Dependency and Sprawl
The U.S. has much higher traffic fatality rates than peer countries due to automobile dependency and sprawl. Better planning can reduce these human sacrifices.

Trump: Federal Government Won’t Pay for California HSR
The President has targeted federal funding for the California bullet train project since his first administration.

San Francisco Enhances Urban Planning Initiatives with Green Infrastructure
San Francisco incorporates green infrastructure in its city development initiatives, elevating the importance of sustainability in urban planning.

Chicago Approves Green Affordable Housing Plan
The Mayor’s plan calls for creating a nonprofit housing corporation tasked with building affordable housing that meets Green Building standards.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Tyler Technologies
New York City School Construction Authority
Village of Glen Ellyn
Transportation Research & Education Center (TREC) at Portland State University
Chaddick Institute at DePaul University
Institute for Housing and Urban Development Studies (IHS)
Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada
Toledo-Lucas County Plan Commissions