Even during times of budget constraint, continued investment in parks is critical, as they provide proven benefits to public health, safety, climate resilience, and community well-being — particularly for under-resourced communities.

Parks are far more than recreational amenities; they are essential public infrastructure that support health, safety, and community well-being. Despite this, they are often among the first services to face cuts during fiscal downturns. Research consistently shows that parks help prevent chronic disease, reduce crime, improve mental health, and foster social cohesion — outcomes that translate to significant cost savings and stronger communities. Programs like Los Angeles County’s Parks After Dark demonstrate how free, accessible recreation in underserved areas can lead to measurable health and safety benefits.
Parks also play a crucial role in climate resilience and environmental stewardship. With their cooling tree canopies, stormwater management functions, and capacity to improve air quality, parks serve as natural infrastructure helping communities adapt to climate change. Initiatives like the transformation of former brownfields into vibrant parks show how land restoration can provide environmental, social, and other benefits. These spaces also contribute to decarbonization efforts through native landscaping, renewable energy use, and promotion of active transportation.
Investing in parks yields high returns: for every dollar spent, up to four dollars in economic, environmental, and health benefits are generated. Moreover, equitable park investment advances racial justice and repairs long-standing disparities in access to green space. As communities face compounding crises — from climate stress to social fragmentation — parks emerge as a unifying and stabilizing force. The question is not whether we can afford to fund parks, but whether we can afford not to.
FULL STORY: Why We Must Keep Investing in Parks

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

San Francisco's School District Spent $105M To Build Affordable Housing for Teachers — And That's Just the Beginning
SFUSD joins a growing list of school districts using their land holdings to address housing affordability challenges faced by their own employees.

Can We Please Give Communities the Design They Deserve?
Often an afterthought, graphic design impacts everything from how we navigate a city to how we feel about it. One designer argues: the people deserve better.

Engineers Gave America's Roads an Almost Failing Grade — Why Aren't We Fixing Them?
With over a trillion dollars spent on roads that are still falling apart, advocates propose a new “fix it first” framework.

The European Cities That Love E-Scooters — And Those That Don’t
Where they're working, where they're banned, and where they're just as annoying the tourists that use them.

Map: Where Senate Republicans Want to Sell Your Public Lands
For public land advocates, the Senate Republicans’ proposal to sell millions of acres of public land in the West is “the biggest fight of their careers.”
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Borough of Carlisle
Smith Gee Studio
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
City of Astoria
Transportation Research & Education Center (TREC) at Portland State University
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
Municipality of Princeton (NJ)