Plaintiffs claim the new state law strips local control of growth, but affordable housing advocates say the lawsuit is just a delay tactic.

Eight New Jersey mayors filed a lawsuit earlier this month against a recently enacted state housing law, S50/A4, which standardized requirements for municipalities to build more housing. According to an article by Brianna Kudisch for NJ.com, the lawsuit claims the state law exceeds what is constitutionally required under state Supreme Court decisions that “outlawed exclusionary zoning practices and required all towns in New Jersey to provide their fair share of the region’s affordable housing” and questions the law’s exemption of 62 municipalities from having affordable housing obligations.
The article reports that an additional eight municipalities are expected to join the lawsuit later the month, but says affordable housing advocates are confident the suit has no legal standing and predict it will be thrown out of court. Adam Gordon, the executive director of the nonprofit Fair Share Housing Center, told NJ.com the lawsuit is a “smokescreen” meant to delay implementation of the law, put forth by “ultra-wealthy communities who have fought affordable housing for decades.”
The plaintiffs claim the law takes away their towns’ say in how they grow, but Gordon told NJ.com that the state law in question “gives towns tools — including new bonuses, financing options and credits — to build affordable housing in the way they want….Towns only lose their ability to be in control of the process when they refuse to find any place to create their fair share of affordable housing.”
According to the National Low Income Housing Coalition, New Jersey has a shortage of 214,000 units of affordable rental housing, and of the 25 percent of the state’s renter households that are extremely low income (making less than $33,290 annually), 74 percent are severely cost burdened.
FULL STORY: 9 N.J. towns sue the state over new affordable housing law

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

Congressman Proposes Bill to Rename DC Metro “Trump Train”
The Make Autorail Great Again Act would withhold federal funding to the system until the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA), rebrands as the Washington Metropolitan Authority for Greater Access (WMAGA).

The Simple Legislative Tool Transforming Vacant Downtowns
In California, Michigan and Georgia, an easy win is bringing dollars — and delight — back to city centers.

In These Cities, Most New Housing is Under 441 Square Feet
With loosened restrictions on “micro-housing,” tiny units now make up as much as 66% of newly constructed housing.

Albuquerque’s Microtransit: A Planner’s Answer to Food Access Gaps
New microtransit vans in Albuquerque aim to close food access gaps by linking low-income areas to grocery stores, cutting travel times by 30 percent and offering planners a scalable model for equity-focused transit.

This City Will Pay You to Meet Your Neighbors
A North Kansas City grant program offers up to $400 for residents to throw neighborhood block parties.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Smith Gee Studio
City of Charlotte
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
City of Astoria
Transportation Research & Education Center (TREC) at Portland State University
US High Speed Rail Association
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
Municipality of Princeton (NJ)