Plaintiffs claim the new state law strips local control of growth, but affordable housing advocates say the lawsuit is just a delay tactic.
Eight New Jersey mayors filed a lawsuit earlier this month against a recently enacted state housing law, S50/A4, which standardized requirements for municipalities to build more housing. According to an article by Brianna Kudisch for NJ.com, the lawsuit claims the state law exceeds what is constitutionally required under state Supreme Court decisions that “outlawed exclusionary zoning practices and required all towns in New Jersey to provide their fair share of the region’s affordable housing” and questions the law’s exemption of 62 municipalities from having affordable housing obligations.
The article reports that an additional eight municipalities are expected to join the lawsuit later the month, but says affordable housing advocates are confident the suit has no legal standing and predict it will be thrown out of court. Adam Gordon, the executive director of the nonprofit Fair Share Housing Center, told NJ.com the lawsuit is a “smokescreen” meant to delay implementation of the law, put forth by “ultra-wealthy communities who have fought affordable housing for decades.”
The plaintiffs claim the law takes away their towns’ say in how they grow, but Gordon told NJ.com that the state law in question “gives towns tools — including new bonuses, financing options and credits — to build affordable housing in the way they want….Towns only lose their ability to be in control of the process when they refuse to find any place to create their fair share of affordable housing.”
According to the National Low Income Housing Coalition, New Jersey has a shortage of 214,000 units of affordable rental housing, and of the 25 percent of the state’s renter households that are extremely low income (making less than $33,290 annually), 74 percent are severely cost burdened.
Read the full story: 9 N.J. towns sue the state over new affordable housing law
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour
If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.
Desperate measures: Advocates weigh draining Lake Powell to fill Colorado River
Draining the reservoir could reduce evaporation losses by a couple hundred thousand acre-feet.
In Texas, data centers are swallowing promised parkland
Residents who moved to Taylor, Texas for a rural community now have to contend with three data centers in their backyard.
How a Chicago-sized wind farm beat the odds and powered on
The project spanned five presidential administrations and a standoff with a U.S. military base.
MTA gives itself 30 days to transform pit into basketball court
The site has been under construction since 2022; the city originally estimated it would finish the court in 2024.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority