A proposed rebate on electric bikes in the District would be more cost-effective in reducing gasoline miles driven than electric car subsidies thanks to the higher elasticity of e-bike demand.

According to an article by David Edmondson in Greater Greater Washington, a proposed $400 to $1,200 e-bike subsidy in Washington, D.C. “packs the most pollution-fighting power” compared to other plans to promote the adoption of zero-emission transportation, bringing the biggest return on investment for reducing gasoline miles driven.
As Edmondson explains, this has to do with the economic concept of elasticity. “[Zero-emission vehicles] are a lot more expensive than e-bikes and, therefore, it takes a lot of money to meaningfully lower the cost of a ZEV compared to an e-bike.” Edmondson used a Canadian model to predict e-bike sales under the new subsidy, predicting a rise of 15 percent in annual sales. “Remarkably, 44% of those sales would go to incentivized buyers who would not have otherwise purchased an e-bike,” Edmondson notes. Most electric car subsidies, on the other hand, tend to be used by people who would already buy electric or hybrid cars.
While they can’t replace all vehicle trips, e-bikes can have a significant impact on gasoline miles. “When a household buys an e-bike, their driving (as measured by vehicle miles traveled, or VMT) decreases by more than a third,” Edmondson found. “When that is taken into consideration, an e-bike subsidy is 2.9 times more effective per dollar at displacing gasoline miles than a ZEV subsidy.”
Edmondson points out the added benefits of e-bikes, such as better health, easier charging, requiring fewer resources for batteries and putting less strain on city streets, and reduced safety risks for pedestrians and other road users.
FULL STORY: Analysis: E-bike subsidies are more cost-effective than EV subsidies

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

Congressman Proposes Bill to Rename DC Metro “Trump Train”
The Make Autorail Great Again Act would withhold federal funding to the system until the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA), rebrands as the Washington Metropolitan Authority for Greater Access (WMAGA).

The Simple Legislative Tool Transforming Vacant Downtowns
In California, Michigan and Georgia, an easy win is bringing dollars — and delight — back to city centers.

The States Losing Rural Delivery Rooms at an Alarming Pace
In some states, as few as 9% of rural hospitals still deliver babies. As a result, rising pre-term births, no adequate pre-term care and "harrowing" close calls are a growing reality.

The Small South Asian Republic Going all in on EVs
Thanks to one simple policy change less than five years ago, 65% of new cars in this Himalayan country are now electric.

DC Backpedals on Bike Lane Protection, Swaps Barriers for Paint
Citing aesthetic concerns, the city is removing the concrete barriers and flexposts that once separated Arizona Avenue cyclists from motor vehicles.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Smith Gee Studio
City of Charlotte
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
City of Astoria
Transportation Research & Education Center (TREC) at Portland State University
US High Speed Rail Association
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
Municipality of Princeton (NJ)