Signs and markings designed for traffic control can make conditions less safe for pedestrians and other road users.
Writing in Streetsblog, Kea Wilson explains how the regulations codified in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) can make roads less safe.
“Since the very first center line appeared on a Michigan road in 1911, many have questioned whether the design norms that govern the U.S. transportation network really make roads ‘safe,’ or simply less dangerous than the anarchic days of early motordom — though they're still nowhere near as safe as the days before the car dominated American roads at all.”
As transportation engineer Ian Lockwood explains, “The [signs, signals and markings in the] MUTCD aren't there to make our streets safer … They’re there to make them faster.” Signs and markings are designed to speed up traffic, and are less necessary at slower speeds. Cities that have experimented with removing signage and markings have seen positive results. “In 2016, transportation engineers in London found that when they removed center lines from several 30 mile-per-hour roads, traffic speeds and potential crash severity plummeted — perhaps validating Lockwood's hypothesis that the yellow line deserves some of the blame for traffic violence on U.S. roads, too.”
The concept known as Shared Space was pioneered by Dutch traffic engineer Hans Monderman, “who famously — if counter-intuitively — advised communities throughout Europe and Australia facing safety challenges to remove streetlights, lane markers, and even crosswalks, rather than following conventional wisdom that would have them install even more of them.” Lockwood adds that a misplaced faith in technology can cause people to behave less cautiously. “The lower tech we go, the more we have to drive responsibly.”
Despite proven increases in actual safety, pedestrians can perceive Shared Space interventions as making streets less safe. Removing physical curbs can also impede mobility for people with visual impairments who use curbs to identify where the sidewalk ends, for example.
But the ideology behind Shared Space—the belief that roads should be safe for all people—can be a useful approach for shifting focus away from trying to influence driver behavior with signage and designing safer roadways in the first place.
Read the full story: Counter-Intuitive Department: Sometimes, Traffic Controls Make Streets More Dangerous
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour
If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.
Chicago breaks ground on $3 billion megadevelopment
The new neighborhood, titled Foundry Park, will one day host 3,700 residences.
Satanic Place Names
From streams and lakes to valleys and canyons, I mapped more than 1,000 places named after the Devil.
California High-Speed Rail Authority CEO resigns after $600,000 scandal
Under Ian Choudri, the authority used taxpayer dollars to fund first class flights and trips to nightclubs.
Want to study the Missouri River? Soon, you may need unanimous approval from 10 states
Legislation would require 10 governors’ permission to study or build projects moving water outside the basin.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority