The paper of record in Southern California is on the record in support of parking reforms.

The Los Angeles Times Editorial Board published support for a new approach to planning and development in Southern California that prioritizes people over cars. Specifically, the editorial supports the elimination of parking requirements, as proposed in two bills under consideration by the California State Legislature, AB 2097 and SB 1067.
Jurisdictions throughout Los Angeles County, a symbol of automobile dependency and car-centric planning, have spent decades building more parking than anything else. According to the editorial, “In Los Angeles County, there are more than 19 million parking spaces, almost two per resident, including children, according to a 2015 analysis. The county has dedicated more space to the storage of cars than it has lane miles of streets and roads.
The article also includes a description of each of the bills. AB 2097 “would eliminate parking requirements for commercial projects and residential developments with 40 or fewer units that were within a half mile of a major transit stop,” for example.
The second bill, SB 1067, is authored by Senate Appropriations Committee chair, Sen. Anthony Portantino (D-La Cañada Flintridge), who killed parking reform legislation, AB 1401, from last year’s legislative session. Portantino took the fury from transit and housing advocates in response to that decision to heart, according to the editorial, and has now proposed a bill that “would prohibit cities from imposing parking requirements on housing developments within a half-mile of a major transit stop if the project includes 20% affordable housing or the developer can show the project wouldn’t negatively affect parking in the area or achieving the localities’ affordable housing development targets.”
According to the assessment of the editorial, AB 2097 is a more ambitious reform. “[SB 1067] gives cities more discretion to maintain parking requirements than [AB 2097’s] approach.” Portantino’s bill also would not apply to commercial buildings.
FULL STORY: Editorial: California should prioritize housing people, not cars

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

Congressman Proposes Bill to Rename DC Metro “Trump Train”
The Make Autorail Great Again Act would withhold federal funding to the system until the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA), rebrands as the Washington Metropolitan Authority for Greater Access (WMAGA).

The Simple Legislative Tool Transforming Vacant Downtowns
In California, Michigan and Georgia, an easy win is bringing dollars — and delight — back to city centers.

Supporting Cycling Takes More Than Just Bike Lanes
Safe, protected bike lanes are a key part of a city’s bike infrastructure — but secure parking, e-bike charging, and other amenities can also influence people’s shift to cycling.

Judge Blocks Anti-DEI Rules for Transportation, Housing Grants
A second injunction blocks the Trump administration from enforcing new regulations for federal funding.

Unhoused People in San Jose Could Face Arrest if They Refuse Shelter
A policy proposed by the city’s mayor would give law enforcement the option to arrest homeless residents if they refuse three offers of housing.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Smith Gee Studio
City of Charlotte
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
City of Astoria
Transportation Research & Education Center (TREC) at Portland State University
US High Speed Rail Association
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
Municipality of Princeton (NJ)