The paper of record in Southern California is on the record in support of parking reforms.
The Los Angeles Times Editorial Board published support for a new approach to planning and development in Southern California that prioritizes people over cars. Specifically, the editorial supports the elimination of parking requirements, as proposed in two bills under consideration by the California State Legislature, AB 2097 and SB 1067.
Jurisdictions throughout Los Angeles County, a symbol of automobile dependency and car-centric planning, have spent decades building more parking than anything else. According to the editorial, “In Los Angeles County, there are more than 19 million parking spaces, almost two per resident, including children, according to a 2015 analysis. The county has dedicated more space to the storage of cars than it has lane miles of streets and roads.
The article also includes a description of each of the bills. AB 2097 “would eliminate parking requirements for commercial projects and residential developments with 40 or fewer units that were within a half mile of a major transit stop,” for example.
The second bill, SB 1067, is authored by Senate Appropriations Committee chair, Sen. Anthony Portantino (D-La Cañada Flintridge), who killed parking reform legislation, AB 1401, from last year’s legislative session. Portantino took the fury from transit and housing advocates in response to that decision to heart, according to the editorial, and has now proposed a bill that “would prohibit cities from imposing parking requirements on housing developments within a half-mile of a major transit stop if the project includes 20% affordable housing or the developer can show the project wouldn’t negatively affect parking in the area or achieving the localities’ affordable housing development targets.”
According to the assessment of the editorial, AB 2097 is a more ambitious reform. “[SB 1067] gives cities more discretion to maintain parking requirements than [AB 2097’s] approach.” Portantino’s bill also would not apply to commercial buildings.
Read the full story: Editorial: California should prioritize housing people, not cars
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour
If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.
Desperate measures: Advocates weigh draining Lake Powell to fill Colorado River
Draining the reservoir could reduce evaporation losses by a couple hundred thousand acre-feet.
Los Angeles just elected an urban planner as its mayor
Transportation analysts are optimistic that Raman will be more aggressive in addressing transit issues than Bass.
Mamdani’s pied-à-terre tax survives legal challenge
A panel of judges found that the plaintiffs failed to demonstrate injury as a result of New York City's implementation of the tax.
Eastern Nebraska is running out of electricity
Data centers and electrification are straining eastern Nebraska’s grid, throttling economic development.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
University of Michigan School for Environment and Sustainability (SEAS)
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority