The ability of the federal government to fund, and define, infrastructure, owes itself to a history of state and federal leadership at the dawn of the nation's existence.

Writing for The Washington Post, Susan Nagel tells the history of the intense rivalries between political leaders in New York (namely Philip Schuyler) and Virginia (namely George Washington) to control waterborne traffic from the Atlantic to the interior of North America.
The challenges of determining the scope of federal power to fund and build infrastructure, and what kinds of projects fell under that power, originates to Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution, which "endowed Congress with the right to provide for national defense and regulate interstate commerce. But, explains, Nagel, "it did not grant Congress the explicit authority to fund what was then known as 'interior improvements' — or what today is called infrastructure."
Thus, the answers to questions of 1) what constituted infrastructure, 2) who was responsible for it, and 3) what role the federal government should play in developing fell politicians like George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and James Monroe.
Hanging in the balance back then was the funding of the Erie Canal, the location of Washington, D.C., and the navigability of the Potomac River hung in the balance. In the contemporary United States, the role of the federal government in funding and building infrastructure—and the definition of infrastructure—is again up for debate.
FULL STORY: A conflict among the Founders is still shaping infrastructure debates in 2021

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

Congressman Proposes Bill to Rename DC Metro “Trump Train”
The Make Autorail Great Again Act would withhold federal funding to the system until the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA), rebrands as the Washington Metropolitan Authority for Greater Access (WMAGA).

The Simple Legislative Tool Transforming Vacant Downtowns
In California, Michigan and Georgia, an easy win is bringing dollars — and delight — back to city centers.

Albuquerque’s Microtransit: A Planner’s Answer to Food Access Gaps
New microtransit vans in Albuquerque aim to close food access gaps by linking low-income areas to grocery stores, cutting travel times by 30 percent and offering planners a scalable model for equity-focused transit.

This City Will Pay You to Meet Your Neighbors
A North Kansas City grant program offers up to $400 for residents to throw neighborhood block parties.

Commentary: Our Silence Will Not Protect Us
Keeping our heads down and our language inoffensive is not the right response to the times we’re in. Solidarity and courage is.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Smith Gee Studio
City of Charlotte
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
City of Astoria
Transportation Research & Education Center (TREC) at Portland State University
US High Speed Rail Association
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
Municipality of Princeton (NJ)