With pooled services suspended through the pandemic and research showing most users prefer private rides, will shared rides continue to play a role in urban transportation?
As ride-hailing companies like Uber and Lyft faced backlash for producing more urban congestion with single-passenger trips, "pooled service seemed to offer a more city-friendly product," and autonomous vehicle producers also designed multi-person pods in preparation for a future of shared-ride transit. But with shared services largely on hold since the start of the pandemic, David Zipper, writing in Bloomberg CityLab, asks whether shared transportation can recover.
Back in February 2018, the nonprofit World Resources Institute unveiled the Shared Mobility Principles for Livable Cities, a set of guidelines that "included a commitment that autonomous vehicles would offer only shared trips within urban areas," according to Zipper. Since then, "a slew of evidence suggests that those who can afford to hail a vehicle would really prefer to have it to themselves," which is "worrisome news for public officials who hoped shared rides could help curb congestion — and for mobility companies who’ve pointed to sharing as a reason their products wouldn’t condemn cities to gridlock." While "sharing trips with strangers is the basic principle behind riding public transportation," sharing rides in private vehicles feels different than larger conveyances like trains or buses. "In a bad situation, you’re more likely to feel trapped in a ride-hail vehicle," making some users more reluctant to use shared rides even outside the public health risks posed by the pandemic.
Without policies to incentivize shared travel through increased convenience or lower cost, the dream of autonomous shared transit could devolve into a growing number of "individual AV trips grinding urban streets to a halt."
FULL STORY: Can Shared Mobility Survive the Pandemic?
Progressive Planning in Ideologically Conservative Communities
Planners must work in diverse political environments including conservative jurisdictions that are skeptical of new issues and perspectives. Here are ways to reconcile conflicting goals.
Amtrak Expanding Service in California’s Central Valley
Amtrak is planning a major expansion to the passenger rail lines connecting the Central Valley and the Bay Area.
Robotaxis Wreak Havoc on Urban Transit
In cities across the United States, robotaxis, championed by companies like Waymo and Cruise, are a marvel of modern technology and a flashpoint for debate over their place in urban transit.
How Good Transit Benefits Communities Beyond its Users
Robust, efficient transit networks can have an outsized impact on vehicle miles traveled, even by non-transit users.
Why Renewables Aren’t Going Anywhere
The worldwide transition to renewable energy sources is already underway as climate change creates more significant impacts on the global supply chain and economy.
Opinion: Supporting Electric School Buses is the Right Thing to Do — and Fiscally Conservative
Why switching school bus fleets to electric vehicles is good for students, the environment, and school districts’ finances.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Desert Recreation District
EMC Planning Group Inc.
University of Southern California
American Planning Association, Sustainable Communities Division
HUDs Office of Policy Development and Research
HUDs Office of Policy Development and Research
Rockdale County Board of Commissioners
Market Building Foundation Inc
Detroit Regional Partnership