Keep up with essential planning news and commentary, delivered to your inbox every Monday and Thursday.
Landlords Facing Loss of Property and Income During Eviction Bans
Nationwide eviction bans in the name of public safety and economic security during the coronavirus pandemic have kept millions of renters in their homes, protected from displacement. Katy O'Donnell says the bans have produced "an unintended side effect" of threatening the livelihoods of residential landlords.
"The sweeping order effectively requires landlords to subsidize distressed tenants’ housing through the end of the year or face criminal penalties and hefty fines. That’s a tall order for the country’s 8 million independent landlords — most of whom lease a unit here or there on property they own without the financial backing of professional management companies," writes O'Donnell.
Some of the landlords to which O'Donnell refers are the owners of single-family buildings with one to four units, which make up for 22 million units in the United States, according to research by the Urban Institute. With the expiration of the CARES act in late July, and without a new financial relief package in the works, lobbyists are working on behalf of building owners to urge Congress to pass some form of rental assistance.
Housing advocates say that investment in rental aid would help renters and landlords alike. Aid slows ever-growing back rent for tenants and generates some income for landlords who must provide rental subsidies during the pandemic.
"Landlords are also challenging Trump's action in court," O'Donnell reports. "A Virginia landlord filed the first federal challenge to the new order on Tuesday, arguing that the CDC is misinterpreting its authority under a 1944 public health law that gives the agency certain powers to prevent communicable diseases from crossing state lines."
Landlords say that the moratorium put in place by the Centers for Disease Control is the equivalent of a state law rewrite. “If the CDC is right, that that regulation allows them to basically do anything they want to as long as they say it’s for public health, then there’s no limit,” laments attorney Caleb Kruckenberg.