California's redevelopment program was killed during the budget fallout of the Great Recession. Now more state politicians see how tax increment devoted to development investments could be one tool int he state's affordable housing crisis.

The Los Angeles Times Editorial Board suggests that the time has come for the state of California to revamp the idea of redevelopment agencies—an idea defunct since former Governor Jerry Brown axed the investment program in the height of the budget austerity of the Great Recession.
The editorial suggests that some of the state's affordable housing shortage could be alleviated by the reintroduction of redevelopment. Instead of the flawed system in place prior to the recession, the editorial calls for a Redevelopment 2.0.
Cities need an ongoing source of money for affordable housing. This is especially important as [Governor Gavin] Newsom and state lawmakers are pushing cities to zone for more homes for Californians at all income levels. Although the need for more market-rate housing can be addressed by lowering regulatory and political barriers, the critical shortage of affordable units is both a political and a financial problem. Simply put, developers can’t produce the amount of affordable housing needed without public subsidies.
Governor Gavin Newsom, in office since the beginning of the year, has spoken in favor of Redevelopment 2.0 before, but he hasn't been consistent on the issue—even as a bill to pursue a new redevelopment program, Assembly Bill 11, died in the Legislature in May. Another attempt at crafting legislation to revive redevelopment is also contained in Senate Bill 5, authored by State Senator Jim Beall (D-San Jose).
The editorial concludes with cautious support for the idea of redevelopment: "The idea behind redevelopment — to give local governments the ability to launch community revitalization projects that the private sector wouldn’t do alone — is still worthwhile. And the needs are at least as great."
FULL STORY: Editorial: Jerry Brown killed redevelopment in California. Gavin Newsom should bring it back to life

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

Congressman Proposes Bill to Rename DC Metro “Trump Train”
The Make Autorail Great Again Act would withhold federal funding to the system until the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA), rebrands as the Washington Metropolitan Authority for Greater Access (WMAGA).

The Simple Legislative Tool Transforming Vacant Downtowns
In California, Michigan and Georgia, an easy win is bringing dollars — and delight — back to city centers.

The States Losing Rural Delivery Rooms at an Alarming Pace
In some states, as few as 9% of rural hospitals still deliver babies. As a result, rising pre-term births, no adequate pre-term care and "harrowing" close calls are a growing reality.

The Small South Asian Republic Going all in on EVs
Thanks to one simple policy change less than five years ago, 65% of new cars in this Himalayan country are now electric.

DC Backpedals on Bike Lane Protection, Swaps Barriers for Paint
Citing aesthetic concerns, the city is removing the concrete barriers and flexposts that once separated Arizona Avenue cyclists from motor vehicles.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Smith Gee Studio
City of Charlotte
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
City of Astoria
Transportation Research & Education Center (TREC) at Portland State University
US High Speed Rail Association
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
Municipality of Princeton (NJ)