Displacement in the San Francisco Bay Area has resulted in distinct mobility patterns and significant race and class inequalities.

A joint project between the Urban Displacement Project and the California Housing Partnership examines the mobility patterns of low-income people of color in the Bay Area to understand the various impacts of rising housing costs and displacement.
The study focuses on three Bay Area counties: Alameda, Contra Costa, and San Francisco. It finds that cities throughout the region lost significant numbers of black households between 2000 and 2015, and that black households were concentrate in particular cities with lower housing costs and less access to resources.
It also identifies areas that were newly segregated with high concentrations of poverty. This phenomenon is attributed to increased housing costs and migration. In addition, the percentage of households in these areas that were black or Latino increased over time. For low-income households that did move, a larger portion of household income went to rent as compared to households that did not move.
The report offers an overview on strategies to counter the effects of displacement and gentrification in the Bay Area:
[These counties] and the region need policies and investments that support housing affordability and stability for low-income people of color, while also increasing their access to high-resource neighborhoods. To be successful, these policies and investments must account for both the legacies of racial segregation and recent patterns of re-segregation.
The Urban Displacement Project has also conducted research on displacement and effects on quality of life, the role of market-rate and subsidized housing in alleviating the Bay Area's housing crisis, and ways to pinpoint areas at risk of gentrification.
FULL STORY: Rising Housing Costs and Resegregation

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

Congressman Proposes Bill to Rename DC Metro “Trump Train”
The Make Autorail Great Again Act would withhold federal funding to the system until the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA), rebrands as the Washington Metropolitan Authority for Greater Access (WMAGA).

The Simple Legislative Tool Transforming Vacant Downtowns
In California, Michigan and Georgia, an easy win is bringing dollars — and delight — back to city centers.

The States Losing Rural Delivery Rooms at an Alarming Pace
In some states, as few as 9% of rural hospitals still deliver babies. As a result, rising pre-term births, no adequate pre-term care and "harrowing" close calls are a growing reality.

The Small South Asian Republic Going all in on EVs
Thanks to one simple policy change less than five years ago, 65% of new cars in this Himalayan country are now electric.

DC Backpedals on Bike Lane Protection, Swaps Barriers for Paint
Citing aesthetic concerns, the city is removing the concrete barriers and flexposts that once separated Arizona Avenue cyclists from motor vehicles.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Smith Gee Studio
City of Charlotte
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
City of Astoria
Transportation Research & Education Center (TREC) at Portland State University
US High Speed Rail Association
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
Municipality of Princeton (NJ)