The 'Head Tax' Failed in Seattle; Cities Still Want the Tax to Support Housing, Transit
"In a stunning reversal without parallel in Seattle’s recent political history, the City Council voted 7-2 Tuesday to repeal a controversial head tax on large employers like Amazon," reports Daniel Beekman.
The vote comes less than a month after the City Council approved the head tax on a unanimous vote. The approved tax was greatly reduced from the original proposal—from $500 to $275 per employee. The compromise resulted from pressure by Amazon after it halted construction on an expansion project as a result of the proposed tax.
The vote to rescind the tax came after a "business-backed campaign to kill the tax prepared to submit petition signatures this week to qualify the referendum for the November ballot," reports Beekman. For additional coverage of the ongoing debate of the Seattle head tax, see also an article by Sarah Holder.
Seattle is not the only city right in tech company capitalism and short on housing affordability to consider the head tax. At the beginning of May, Wendy Lee wrote of a "Google Tax" that could "fix every Silicon Valley problem." Specifically, the city of Mountain View is considering a ballot initiative that would tax companies based on how many employees they have. George Avalos provided coverage of the same proposed tax later in the month.
The potential spread of head taxes gained attention around the country. Writing for the Seattle Times, in the home of Amazon, Eric Newcomer wrote of the numerous cities considering a version of a head tax, including San Francisco, Cupertino, and East Palo Alto, in addition to Seattle and Mountain View. Articles in Smart Cities Dive, The Wall Street Journal [paywall], and Bloomberg look at the larger trend of cities exploring the head tax as a potential source of funding for the woes of contemporary urban living.