If your city was home to some of the wealthiest, largest companies in the country, would you tax them to raise money for more housing and transit service?

"In a stunning reversal without parallel in Seattle’s recent political history, the City Council voted 7-2 Tuesday to repeal a controversial head tax on large employers like Amazon," reports Daniel Beekman.
The vote comes less than a month after the City Council approved the head tax on a unanimous vote. The approved tax was greatly reduced from the original proposal—from $500 to $275 per employee. The compromise resulted from pressure by Amazon after it halted construction on an expansion project as a result of the proposed tax.
The vote to rescind the tax came after a "business-backed campaign to kill the tax prepared to submit petition signatures this week to qualify the referendum for the November ballot," reports Beekman. For additional coverage of the ongoing debate of the Seattle head tax, see also an article by Sarah Holder.
Seattle is not the only city right in tech company capitalism and short on housing affordability to consider the head tax. At the beginning of May, Wendy Lee wrote of a "Google Tax" that could "fix every Silicon Valley problem." Specifically, the city of Mountain View is considering a ballot initiative that would tax companies based on how many employees they have. George Avalos provided coverage of the same proposed tax later in the month.
The potential spread of head taxes gained attention around the country. Writing for the Seattle Times, in the home of Amazon, Eric Newcomer wrote of the numerous cities considering a version of a head tax, including San Francisco, Cupertino, and East Palo Alto, in addition to Seattle and Mountain View. Articles in Smart Cities Dive, The Wall Street Journal [paywall], and Bloomberg look at the larger trend of cities exploring the head tax as a potential source of funding for the woes of contemporary urban living.
FULL STORY: About-face: Seattle City Council repeals head tax amid pressure from businesses, referendum threat

Planetizen’s Top Planning Books of 2023
The world is changing, and planning with it.

Chicago Red Line Extension Could Transform the South Side
The city’s transit agency is undertaking its biggest expansion ever to finally bring rail to the South Side.

How ‘Daylighting’ Intersections Can Save Lives
Eliminating visual obstructions can make intersections safer for all users.

Green Spaces Benefit Neighborhoods—When Residents can Reach Them
A study comparing green space and walkability scores found that, without effective access to local parks, residents of greener neighborhoods don’t reap the health benefits.

Eugene Ends Parking Minimums
In a move that complies with a state law aimed at reducing transportation emissions, Eugene amended its parking rules to eliminate minimum requirements and set maximum parking lot sizes.

Chicago Announces ‘Better Streets for Buses’ Plan
The plan establishes a ‘toolkit’ of improvements to make the bus riding experience more reliable, comfortable, and accessible.
Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization
City of Morganton
San Joaquin County
HUD's Office of Policy Development and Research
HUD's Office of Policy Development and Research
Chaddick Institute at DePaul University
Park City Municipal Corporation
National Capital Planning Commission
City of Santa Fe, New Mexico
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.