One finding from a new statewide survey, "Californians and the Environment," suggests that the environment is becoming a more bipartisan issue, but that finding is still subject to interpretation. What isn't is the top environmental issue: water.
San Francisco Chronicle on July 25.
On a variety of California environmental issues, a solid percentage of Republicans show they’re willing to break with President Trump and his environmental policies on subjects like water policy and global warming, said Mark Baldassare, the institute’s CEO and president as well as director of the poll [and former professor of urban and regional planning at the University of California, Irvine.]
“The environment is a very personal thing in California,” Baldassare said. “Air pollution, drought, water quality and wildfires are not Republican versus Democrat issues.”
"Likely voters see drought and water supply as the top environmental issue facing the state, followed by air pollution," notes the survey summary.
As evidence of increasing support by Republicans for environmental issues, Wildermuth cites the poll's findings on Proposition 3, an $8.9 billion bond on the November ballot for a range of water projects, that has "support from 58 percent of California’s likely voters, with 25 percent opposed and 17 percent undecided. But while 72 percent of Democrats surveyed back the bond measure, what’s striking is that Republicans, despite a well-documented aversion to new spending, also support the spending, 43 percent to 38 percent."
Prop. 3 may deal with watershed conservation, but is it really an environmental measure from a political perspective? After all, the Sierra Club opposes [pdf] the measure, calling it "a fiscally irresponsible approach to California's water problems.
A large portion of the bond measure would assist farmers in the San Joaquin Valley, whose abundant use of groundwater is causing a major subsidence problem. Repairing the Friant-Kern Canal that largely delivers irrigation water to 15 water and irrigation districts would receive $350 million, with the Friant area receiving another $400 million in watershed projects.
Notwithstanding the political considerations in the water bond initiative, the PPIC "survey shows just how deeply environmental concerns are ingrained in Californians, regardless of party or ethnicity, Baldassare said.
“Many Republicans want stronger environmental protection and believe in climate change,” he said. “They’re concerned about air pollution and auto emissions.”
Up to a point, adds Wildermuth. "That doesn’t mean California Republicans are lining up to join the Sierra Club. While 82 percent of Democrats and 66 percent of independents surveyed were opposed to allowing more oil drilling off the California coast, 54 percent of GOP adults were in favor of it."
It should be noted that opposition to offshore drilling is bipartisan in states such as New Jersey and Florida.
The survey also found that black and Latino voters placed greater priority on climate change and air pollution than the state's white voters.
Dan Morain also writes on the PPIC survey and Prop. 3 for CALmatters.
Read the full story: Poll shows surprising GOP tilt toward environmental issues in California
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour
If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.
Chicago breaks ground on $3 billion megadevelopment
The new neighborhood, titled Foundry Park, will one day host 3,700 residences.
California High-Speed Rail Authority CEO resigns after $600,000 scandal
Under Ian Choudri, the authority used taxpayer dollars to fund first class flights and trips to nightclubs.
Want to study the Missouri River? Soon, you may need unanimous approval from 10 states
Legislation would require 10 governors’ permission to study or build projects moving water outside the basin.
Desperate measures: Advocates weigh draining Lake Powell to fill Colorado River
Draining the reservoir could reduce evaporation losses by a couple hundred thousand acre-feet.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority