A timely debate, as New York City debates a congestion pricing scheme proposed by Gov. Andrew Cuomo, and California looks for ways to reduce emissions from transportation.

Michael Manville tackles the big, politically challenging problem of congestion pricing. Of particular concern is the typical congestion pricing opposition argument of its impact on populations living in poverty.
Before debating the question of whether tolls are fair, Manville explains congestion pricing and also cites examples of the success of congestion pricing schemes in London, Stockholm, Milan, and Singapore. If you're looking for a clear, concise explanation of the concepts behind congestion pricing, the beginning of Manville's article is a good place to start.
Then, Manville turns to the polemic, and the question of congestion pricing's fairness to people dealing with poverty.
…Tolls would be regressive — their burden is larger for lower-income people. On the other hand, not all low-income people drive. The poorest people generally can’t afford cars, so tolls would not hurt the most vulnerable — and might even help them (if reduced traffic congestion let buses travel faster).
That said, many low-income people do drive, and tolls may burden them. Fortunately, tolls also come with a built-in solution to this problem: revenue. Toll revenue can offset costs for low-income drivers…
More compelling arguments to refute the idea that congestion pricing can't be fair, and also that the status quo is fair at all, conclude the article. For the real world situations where large population centers are considering measures to mitigate congestion and its negative environmental and economic outcomes, see the debate over Governor Andrew Cuomo's congestion pricing proposal for New York City, and a discussion of California's elephant in the room of climate change: emissions from cars.
FULL STORY: Is congestion pricing fair to the poor?

Maui's Vacation Rental Debate Turns Ugly
Verbal attacks, misinformation campaigns and fistfights plague a high-stakes debate to convert thousands of vacation rentals into long-term housing.

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

In Urban Planning, AI Prompting Could be the New Design Thinking
Creativity has long been key to great urban design. What if we see AI as our new creative partner?

Cal Fire Chatbot Fails to Answer Basic Questions
An AI chatbot designed to provide information about wildfires can’t answer questions about evacuation orders, among other problems.

What Happens if Trump Kills Section 8?
The Trump admin aims to slash federal rental aid by nearly half and shift distribution to states. Experts warn this could spike homelessness and destabilize communities nationwide.

Sean Duffy Targets Rainbow Crosswalks in Road Safety Efforts
Despite evidence that colorful crosswalks actually improve intersection safety — and the lack of almost any crosswalks at all on the nation’s most dangerous arterial roads — U.S. Transportation Secretary Duffy is calling on states to remove them.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Appalachian Highlands Housing Partners
Gallatin County Department of Planning & Community Development
Heyer Gruel & Associates PA
Mpact (founded as Rail~Volution)
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
City of Astoria
City of Portland
City of Laramie