The Democratic-controlled New Mexico legislature passed a 5-cents per gallon fuel tax increase and the Republican-controlled Assembly in Wisconsin backed a plan to apply sales tax to fuel, but their Republican governors oppose any tax hikes.
Efforts to increase transportation funding through hiking user fees continue to make significant process in 2017, but getting to the finish line is extremely challenging. An effort in Louisiana to hike gas taxes 17 cents per gallon, posted May 25, faces the "California challenge" of meeting a two-thirds supermajority legislative threshold, but has the support of Democratic Gov. John Bel Edwards. Backers delayed a vote until next week, reports the Associated Press.
In New Mexico, Senate Bill 2, sponsored by Representative Jim R. Trujillo - (D) and Senator Clemente Sanchez - (D) hikes gas and diesel taxes by five cents per gallon and add a $55 registration fee on interstate freight trucks. It passed the Democratic-controlled legislature on May 25, but Republican Gov. Susana Martinez vows to veto any tax hikes, reports the Associated Press.
Chances of a legislative override, as was done on May 10 by South Carolina's Republican-controlled legislature over Republican Gov. Henry McMaster's veto of the 12-cents per gallon gas tax hike, or by Nebraska's Republican-controlled unicameral legislature over Republican Gov. Pete Ricketts in May 2015 of the 6-cents per gallon gas tax increase, would appear to be extremely unlikely.
"The bill passed 37-28 along mostly partisan lines, with conservative state Rep. Candie Sweetser, D-Deming, joining all Republicans present in voting no," according to the NM Political Report.
In Wisconsin, a comprehensive tax reform package titled "The Road to a Flat Tax" by Representative Dale Kooyenga includes "applying the 5 percent state sales tax to fuel purchases while cutting the 30.9-cent per-gallon fuel tax by 4.8 cents," report Matthew Defour and Mark Sommerhauser on May 5 for the Wisconsin State Journal
Together, those changes net an increase of about $380 million in revenue for roads, bridges and transit over the next two years, according to an estimate from the nonpartisan Legislative Fiscal Bureau.
The plan would create an annual fee of $30 for hybrid vehicles and $125 for electric vehicles, yielding about $4.8 million over the next two years, and seek federal approval to begin tolling U.S. interstates in Wisconsin.
The plan also calls for rolling back the state’s minimum markup requirement for fuel sales, which Assembly Republicans predict will cause the overall price of fuel to decline, despite the new sales tax on fuel.
The proposal is backed by more than 40 of the 64 Republican members of the 99 member state Assembly, including Speaker Robin Vos, R-Rochester. The plan is blasted by Assembly Democrats because of what they view as regressive changes to the income tax. So far it has received a mixed reception by the Republican-controlled state Senate.
Gov. Scott Walker's approach
LIke his Republican counterparts in New Mexico, South Carolina, and Nebraska, Gov. Scott Walker opposes any tax hikes.
Walker’s budget calls for closing a nearly $1 billion shortfall in the transportation fund with $500 million in borrowing, delaying some major projects and transferring money from the general fund. He also is increasing funding for county and municipal road aid, though local government officials have said it’s not enough to address their long-term costs.
That approach, which Walker encapsulated in a May 25 press release, "Get it Done," was not received well by Assembly Majority Leader Jim Steineke (R-Kaukauna), according to WTAQ:
“Everybody we talk to thinks it’s crazy to delay projects and make them more expensive in the future, or…just continue to put the cost of these things on the credit card,” he said. “Everybody I talk to thinks that we should pay for it as we go.”
Hat tip to AASHTO Daily Transportation Update.
Read the full story: Assembly GOP plan overhaul fuel taxes, steers state toward flat income tax
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour
If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.
Desperate measures: Advocates weigh draining Lake Powell to fill Colorado River
Draining the reservoir could reduce evaporation losses by a couple hundred thousand acre-feet.
US buildings threatened, destroyed by fires set to triple by 2060
Researchers found a high fire risk for socioeconomically vulnerable neighborhoods in the American West.
LA residents may be allowed to paint their own crosswalks
Councilwoman Katy Yaroslavsky put out a motion instructing the Los Angeles Department of Public Transportation to study the feasibility of allowing volunteers to paint crosswalks.
Dallas moves to overhaul its zoning code
The city's zoning reform will allow more multi-family and mixed-use developments.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority