Devolution—or the end of federal funding for local or regional transit projects—is back on the table, thanks to the Trump Administration. Articles in two prominent media outlets debate the idea.
Jeff Wood takes to the Overhead Wire blog to push back on recent political clamoring for the end of federal funding for transit investments at the local level—a policy known to many wonks as devolution.
The debate has erupted after news that the Trump Administration's draft budget would completely cut federal contributions to the TIGER competitive grant program and all transit capital investment. Meanwhile, the federal government would continue to fund highway projects.
That news led Jeffrey Dorfman, an economics professor at the University of Georgia, to write an op-ed for Forbes describing Trump's proposed budget as a "great start on de-federalizing local spending." Dorfman's central premise: that local governments and municipalities don't have a good argument to support federal funding for local projects such as transit.
Wood responds to specific points in Dorfman's argument, even finding a few points where they agree, but "for different reasons." Wood works especially to debunk Dorfman's assumption that highway projects all serve the national interest.
Hat tip to Angie Schmitt for sharing the Overhead Wire article, as well as the news about the Trump Administration's budget plans.
FULL STORY: It's Not Devolution, It's Spite
Trump's Draft Budget: Very Bad News for Transit Planners
Transit advocates should be concerned about the cuts proposed by the Trump Administration's early budget draft.
Trump Budget Blueprint Would Nix Federal Transit Spending
Reports from inside the Trump transition are that the incoming administration will follow a budget blueprint laid out by the Heritage Foundation—public transit not included.
The News Is Not All Bad
President Trump's election might not be a disaster for local transit.
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
Congressman Proposes Bill to Rename DC Metro “Trump Train”
The Make Autorail Great Again Act would withhold federal funding to the system until the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA), rebrands as the Washington Metropolitan Authority for Greater Access (WMAGA).
The Simple Legislative Tool Transforming Vacant Downtowns
In California, Michigan and Georgia, an easy win is bringing dollars — and delight — back to city centers.
The States Losing Rural Delivery Rooms at an Alarming Pace
In some states, as few as 9% of rural hospitals still deliver babies. As a result, rising pre-term births, no adequate pre-term care and "harrowing" close calls are a growing reality.
The Small South Asian Republic Going all in on EVs
Thanks to one simple policy change less than five years ago, 65% of new cars in this Himalayan country are now electric.
DC Backpedals on Bike Lane Protection, Swaps Barriers for Paint
Citing aesthetic concerns, the city is removing the concrete barriers and flexposts that once separated Arizona Avenue cyclists from motor vehicles.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Smith Gee Studio
City of Charlotte
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
City of Astoria
Transportation Research & Education Center (TREC) at Portland State University
US High Speed Rail Association
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
Municipality of Princeton (NJ)