The conventional planning wisdom seems to be that long drives are less beneficial to well-being than a short walk. But what about other commuting options?
Last week, I saw something on Twitter I had already seen several times: a link to studies suggesting that people are happier when they can walk to work than when they spend a long time driving to work. This claim strikes me as only slightly less obvious than the claim that water is wet. But at the same time, it raises more questions than it answers. For example:
*Is commuting-related unhappiness limited to driving, or is the long-distance commuter equally dissatisfied whether she bikes, drives, takes a bus, or takes a train? Or to put it another way, does the sheer length of commuting reduce well-being, or is mode choice also an important factor? For example, if a commuter's choice is between a 20 minute drive and a 40 minute subway ride, which is more demoralizing? One British study suggests drivers are as happy or happier than transit users when commuting time is equal; another study disagrees.
*The "short walk/long drive" dichotomy presupposes that work is in a downtown or other walkable neighborhood, while the long drive is from the outer edges of suburbia. But most Americans (including me) work in suburbs. If a commuter's job is in a suburban office park, is he happier living close to the office park, or should he prefer a long ride from a more walkable neighborhood?
*Given that, other things being equal, a short walk is better than a long drive, how should a commuter weigh that factor against other factors? For example, the rent for my current apartment in Manhattan is comparable to the rent for a two-bedroom apartment in Queens, or a three-bedroom house in Suffolk County. As a single person, the extra space is useless to me. But if I had a spouse and a child or two, would the benefits of the extra space outweigh whatever unhappiness I suffered from my commute?
I don't know the answers to any of these questions; I only claim that further research is worthwhile.
4 Ways to Use AI in Urban Planning and City Design
With the ability to predict trends, engage citizens, enhance resource allocation, and guide decision-making, artificial intelligence has the potential to serve as planners’ very own multi-tool.
LA’s ‘Spongy’ Infrastructure Captured Almost 9 Billion Gallons of Water
The city is turning away from stormwater management practices that shuttle water to the ocean, building infrastructure that collects and directs it underground instead.
Oregon Town Seeks Funding for Ambitious Resilience Plan
Like other rural communities, Grants Pass is eager to access federal funding aimed at sustainability initiatives, but faces challenges when it comes to meeting grant requirements.
10 States Where Insurance Costs Impact Housing Affordability
Insurance companies are responding to the increasing frequency and intensity of severe weather events caused by climate change by raising home insurance premiums in high-risk states, adding another hurdle to housing affordability in the U.S.
Rewilding the Golf Course
How former golf courses are being transformed from manicured lawns to vibrant habitats.
Safe Streets Ballot Measure Runs Into Unexpected Opposition
Los Angeles's Measure HLA would compel the city to make serious upgrades for walking, biking, and other forms of active transportation, all in the name of saving lives. Its biggest opponent: the firefighters union.
City of Grand Forks, North Dakota
HUD's Office of Policy Development and Research
Harvard GSD Executive Education
City of Laramie, Wyoming
Colorado Department of Local Affairs
Lassen County Planning and Building Services
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.