The Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority's Waterfront rail line carries 400 riders a day. As the authority struggles to fill a $7 million budgetary gap, is it time to finally bury the unused line?
Tim Kovach explores the implications of a recent decision to raise fares on the Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority (GCRTA) system in light of a $7 million budget shortfall. The GCRTA Board of Trustees recently "approved a series of stepwise fare increases that will take effect on August 16, which should increase annual operating revenues by $3.5 million. Single-ride fares will increase to $2.50 from $2.25 currently and, ultimately, rise again to $2.75 in August 2018. All day passes will increase from $5 to $5.50 and ultimately $6, while monthly passes will jump from $85 to $95 and then $105."
Not only do those fare increases mean "Cleveland’s fares are now on par with, or even higher than, some of the most extensive transit systems in the country," writes Kovach, they also won't cover the extent of the deficit.
Which brings Kovach to the debate over what to do with the GCRTA's "Ghost Line"—officially known as the Waterfront rail line, "which ferries customers from the Tower City transit hub along the Cuyahoga River and lakefront to the South Harbor," carrying 400 passengers a day and an average of two riders per off-peak train.
The main theme of the article is what exactly to do about the Ghost Train, in light of development expectations along the line as well as sunk cost (the line cost $50 million to construct and opened in 1996). Kovach recommends a few steps planners and local officials should take to determine the future of the line.
Read the full story: Asking some lingering questions about cutting service on the Waterfront Line
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
California plans to bury El Niño’s downpour
If the state plays its cards right, it may be able to store a billion acre-feet of El Niño’s water in aquifers.
Desperate measures: Advocates weigh draining Lake Powell to fill Colorado River
Draining the reservoir could reduce evaporation losses by a couple hundred thousand acre-feet.
Mamdani’s pied-à-terre tax survives legal challenge
A panel of judges found that the plaintiffs failed to demonstrate injury as a result of New York City's implementation of the tax.
Eastern Nebraska is running out of electricity
Data centers and electrification are straining eastern Nebraska’s grid, throttling economic development.
Seattle passes record-breaking transit services expansion
Proposition 1 will double the city’s transit tax to add 95,000 more bus trips and preserve 180,000 bus trips annually.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
City of Rosemead
Rutgers University, Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy
One Hundred Miles
University of Michigan School for Environment and Sustainability (SEAS)
Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY)
The Architects Foundation
City of Cambridge
Montrose County
The Pocatello Development Authority