What L.A.'s New Expo Line Extension Won't Do

The $1.5 billion, 6.6-mile light rail extension from Culver City to Santa Monica is projected to double trips on the line by 2030, giving commuters a viable alternative to driving. Just the same, don't expect the extension to reduce congestion.

3 minute read

May 23, 2016, 10:00 AM PDT

By Irvin Dawid


Expo Line

Neon Tommy / Flickr

Metro Expo Line Map (Image)

Credit: LA Metro Expo Line (note seven new stations: Palms—Santa Monica)

"The light rail extension won’t put a dent in traffic, not in the long run," writes Aarian Marshall for Wired. "But it’s still worth every penny.

So much for Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti's assurances last February. 

The Expo Line connects and crosses through some of our most traffic-ridden corridors,” Garcetti said. “This is a huge step forward in our work to ease congestion.”

Induced demand applies to transit as well as asphalt

Growing the ridership by 35,000 trips to 64,000 in 14 years will be a major feat, but how will the extension impact congestion? Marshall asks transportation expert, Professor Genevieve Giuliano of the University of Southern California (USC) what the effect would be if ten thousand motorists chose to immediately forsake driving and take the Expo Line. Giuliano has been studying the issue.

“Ten thousand vehicles out of literally hundreds of thousands that are moving around—it would be really hard to see,” she says.

In a study published last year, Giuliano and her colleagues used sensor data to take a close look at how the opening of the first phase of the Expo line in 2012 affected congestion in the immediate area. They didn’t see much. “The congestion reduction benefits of [light rail] are likely very limited,” they concluded.

You can thank the rule of induced demand: More space for cars doesn’t mean less traffic, it means more cars. When folks ditch their cars for a smooth and stress-free transit ride, other drivers move to exploit a suddenly less clogged stretch of freeway, either by changing their driving patterns or taking trips they wouldn’t have otherwise. The new Expo Line will move more people more places, sure. But it won’t cure traffic.

Looking at Planetizen posts tagged under the topic, it's easy to see that the concept is generally applied to adding more vehicle capacity, which has the adverse impact of reducing transit ridership, unlike adding transit capacity.

“The best thing you can say is that [the Expo extension] will provide people with an option for traveling in congestion,” says Brian Taylor, director of UCLA’s Institute of Transportation Studies.

Taylor is wary of exorbitant rail projects that are attractive to voters but may "betray 'transit’s critical social service function'": improving the lives of lower income people, particularly when lower-priced, high-frequency bus service may prove more cost effective.

A few streetcar projects that may fall in the category were posted here recently. 

A final note on the transit—traffic congestion relationship taught to me by public transit advocate Roy Nakadegawa. While transit may not place much of a dent in traffic congestion, congestion prompts the need to create and improve public transit, as well as adding road capacity. Perhaps the best way to tackle congestion is through economic means.

See more Planetizen coverage of the Expo Line which opened Friday after six years of construction.

Hat tip to Metro Library's L.A. Transportation Headlines

Friday, May 20, 2016 in Wired

portrait of professional woman

I love the variety of courses, many practical, and all richly illustrated. They have inspired many ideas that I've applied in practice, and in my own teaching. Mary G., Urban Planner

I love the variety of courses, many practical, and all richly illustrated. They have inspired many ideas that I've applied in practice, and in my own teaching.

Mary G., Urban Planner

Cover CM Credits, Earn Certificates, Push Your Career Forward

Aerial view of town of Wailuku in Maui, Hawaii with mountains in background against cloudy sunset sky.

Maui's Vacation Rental Debate Turns Ugly

Verbal attacks, misinformation campaigns and fistfights plague a high-stakes debate to convert thousands of vacation rentals into long-term housing.

July 1, 2025 - Honolulu Civil Beat

Logo for Planetizen Federal Action Tracker with black and white image of U.S. Capitol with water ripple overlay.

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker

A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

July 2, 2025 - Diana Ionescu

White and purple sign for Slow Street in San Francisco, California with people crossing crosswalk.

San Francisco Suspends Traffic Calming Amidst Record Deaths

Citing “a challenging fiscal landscape,” the city will cease the program on the heels of 42 traffic deaths, including 24 pedestrians.

July 1, 2025 - KQED

Google street view image of strip mall in suburban Duncanville, Texas.

Adaptive Reuse Will Create Housing in a Suburban Texas Strip Mall

A developer is reimagining a strip mall property as a mixed-use complex with housing and retail.

3 hours ago - Parking Reform Network

Blue tarps covering tents set up by unhoused people along chain link fence on concrete sidewalk.

Study: Anti-Homelessness Laws Don’t Work

Research shows that punitive measures that criminalized unhoused people don’t help reduce homelessness.

5 hours ago - Next City

Aerial tram moving along cable in hilly area in Medellin, Colombia.

In U.S., Urban Gondolas Face Uphill Battle

Cities in Latin America and Europe have embraced aerial transitways — AKA gondolas — as sustainable, convenient urban transport, especially in tricky geographies. American cities have yet to catch up.

7 hours ago - InTransition Magazine