What's Wrong With the Ethanol Mandate?

A former EPA official makes the case in a New York Times op-ed that the ethanol mandate, a major issue in Monday's presidential caucus in Iowa, the nation's top corn producer, is implemented so poorly that it is not benefiting the environment.

3 minute read

February 2, 2016, 8:00 AM PST

By Irvin Dawid


Rather than scrapping the ethanol mandate, as many critics want, Margo Oge, author and former director of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's office of transportation and air quality from 1994 to 2012, wants to change the way the mandate, formerly known as the Renewable Fuels Standard (RFS), is implemented. 

[The U.S. EPA implements the program in consultation with U.S. Department of Agriculture and the Department of Energy.]

The RFS requires that 36 billion gallons of biofuel must be mixed into gasoline by 2022. "Of that [36 billion gallons], about 85 percent of that blend is supposed to come from a nearly even mix of corn ethanol and cellulosics (derived from wood chips, corn stover, grasses and other nonedible plant parts)." More on the failure to meet this requirement below. 

Oge wants to change the question asked to politicians from:

  • “Do you support the renewable fuel standard?” to 
  • “How do we move to the next generation of renewable fuels?” 

That's the case she makes in a Nov. 15, 2015, Wall Street Journal debate. "The debate over the Renewable Fuel Standard often falls into a predictable—and misleading—rut: corn ethanol versus petroleum," she argues. "This discussion is a distraction from the bigger issue: how to develop and scale up the next generation of biofuels, like cellulosics."

What's wrong is the approach: "Ethanol thrives because of the volume-based approach of the mandate, which specifies that a growing percentage of various renewable fuels must be mixed into gasoline every year until 2022."

But that approach has stifled innovation and, if its track record to date is any indication, biofuels will not be a major player in meeting our 2050 targets for reducing greenhouse gas emissions from cars and trucks.

A better approach would be "performance based," such as Obama administration's fuel efficiency standard of 54.5 mpg by 2025. There is not one but several ways to meet that goal: battery electric vehicles, hybrids, lighter materials; everything but "clean diesel."

Such an approach is taken by the Low Carbon Fuels Standard (LCFS) in California and the Oregon Clean Fuels Program

The California program requires fuel producers to reduce greenhouse gas pollution by 10 percent in transportation fuels in 2020. Because it is technology neutral, and interested only in the result, this approach supports investments in the cleanest fuels while providing maximum flexibility to the industry to develop them.

In fact, the LCFS was attacked by both the oil and ethanol industries - talk about strange bedfellows.  Out-of-state ethanol refineries felt they would be at a disadvantage in the program. The California Air Resources Board (CARB) won at the Federal Appeals level and the Supreme Court declined to hear a challenge.

That flexibility is not seen in the federal RFS for a variety of challenging reasons:

Because corn ethanol is cheap and easy to produce and was already in use as a gasoline additive before the mandate was imposed, and because existing corn ethanol plants are exempted from greenhouse gas emissions requirements, production has vastly exceeded that of cellulosic ethanol. In 2014, less than 2 percent of the mandated volume of cellulosics was produced.

Oge goes on to recommend changes to the existing RFS program to make it work better. Her strongest point is that the nation can't meet its carbon reduction targets by "(a)dvances in propulsion technology. Passenger cars will have to not only go farther on less fuel, but also travel those miles on lower-carbon fuel."

Friday, January 29, 2016 in The New York Times - The Opinion Pages

courses user

As someone new to the planning field, Planetizen has been the perfect host guiding me into planning and our complex modern challenges. Corey D, Transportation Planner

As someone new to the planning field, Planetizen has been the perfect host guiding me into planning and our complex modern challenges.

Corey D, Transportation Planner

Ready to give your planning career a boost?

Commercial street in small rural U.S. town with storefronts and clocktower.

Progressive Planning in Ideologically Conservative Communities

Planners must work in diverse political environments including conservative jurisdictions that are skeptical of new issues and perspectives. Here are ways to reconcile conflicting goals.

November 7, 2024 - Todd Litman

Amtrak Coast Starlight passenger train passing over bridge in Altamont Pass, California.

Amtrak Expanding Service in California’s Central Valley

Amtrak is planning a major expansion to the passenger rail lines connecting the Central Valley and the Bay Area.

November 4, 2024 - The Modesto Bee

Aerial view of downtown Lexington, Kentucky.

Lexington, Kentucky Passes Urban Growth Plan

The city’s new master plan sets out requirements for mixed-use development.

November 6, 2024 - The Lexington Times

View of traffic on San Diego freeway.

Opinion: Why Linking Driving to GDP Misses the Point

The argument that car-centric development is good because it boosts national GDP ignores the massive costs of driving to everyday Americans.

November 13 - Streetsblog USA

White BART public transit train at Coliseum station in Oakland, California.

San Francisco’s BART Awarded $545 Loan for Upgraded Rail Cars

The agency plans to modernize its fleet with more efficient rail cars equipped with new safety features.

November 13 - Golden Gate Media

Large roof with solar panels and Los Angeles hills in background.

How Los Angeles County is Advancing Sustainability

A recently released report by the Chief Sustainability Office (CSO) shows that L.A. County is making progress on meeting the goals of the OurCounty Sustainability Plan.

November 13 - Los Angeles County Chief Sustainability Office

Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools

This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.

Planning for Universal Design

Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.