New green buildings may be de riguer, but preservation does less harm.
In the last 50 years, humans have used more raw materials and created more waste than in all previous history,” report Jean Carroon FAIA and Ben Carlson.
By now, recycling and reuse are firmly rooted concepts in the American consumer conscience. But when it comes to building, the merits of maintaining and preserving existing buildings are often trumped by the short-term cost efficiencies of replacement and the rewards of green certification.
The built environment is the single largest consumer of materials, which account for 42 percent of all greenhouse gasses emitted in the United States. "Every product, no matter how green, has environmental impacts that include carbon emissions, water and energy consumption, pollution, toxicity, and waste," write Carroon and Carlson. Toxicity from building materials, such as the flame retardants used on everything from carpets to cables, impacts all Americans. "These chemicals are linked to dna mutation, thyroid disruption, memory and learning problems, delayed mental and physical development, lower IQ, advanced puberty, and reduced fertility."
Another critical concern often overlooked is the immediate impact of greenhouse gases emitted from building material extraction, production, construction, and disposal in favor of the touted energy efficiencies of new green buildings. But these energy savings are long-term projections, according to Careen and Carlson, pointing to a 2012 report for the National Trust for Historic Preservation. "It can take between 10 and 80 years for even an energy-efficient new building to overcome, through cleaner operations, the climate change impacts created by its construction." Carroon and Carlson argue that even if we do eventually achieve the goal of manufacturing totally clean and green buildings, there is inherent value in preservation. "Doesn’t a sustainable world need to value what already exists not only for environmental reasons but also to foster creativity, social engagement, and a unique sense of place?"
Read the full story: Old is the new green
Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.
Data reveals that NYC’s bet on congestion pricing has paid off
After almost two years of the program, reports show positive impacts on traffic and air quality and no disruptions to parking.
HUD modernizes 50-year-old manufactured housing framework
The Next Generation Manufactured Housing Action Plan establishes new energy-efficiency standards for manufactured homes, and new guidelines for anchoring them.
Small single-family homes are illegal in most of MA. Voters can change that
Most land zoned for single-family housing in Massachusetts requires at least 40,000 square feet of land per house.
Public steps inside U.S.’s first battery-powered train
Metra’s groundbreaking train feature modern seats and a futuristic battery car.
Companies show off AI technology, new innovation hubs at APTA Expo
Nearly 700 companies attended the American Public Transportation Association’s Expo last week, which happens once every three years.
FREE Course: Walkable City 1: Why Walkability?
After describing his path towards focusing on walkability as the essence of good planning, Jeff Speck marches through his five principal reasons for making more walkable places.
Reinventing Malls: Planning Alchemy—Turning Gray Fields Into Gold
The course focuses on the opportunities and imperatives that shape reinvention of mall sites.
One Hundred Miles
County of Mendocino
planning NEXT
The Architects Foundation
University of Cincinnati Online
Montrose County
Northern Illinois Transit Authority (NITA)
The Pocatello Development Authority