With a surging homeless population, the city's cluster site program incentivizes slumlords and reduces the supply of affordable housing.

The cluster-site program, an emergency housing program for homeless New Yorkers, has been criticized as a dysfunctional shelter system, yet the 83-unit building at Clarkson Avenue, in the middle of a gentrifying Brooklyn neighborhood, represents "one of the most complex and intractable challenges confronting" New York City Mayor Bill DeBlasio, writes Vivan Yee for the New York Times.
The program, which pays for homeless people to live temporarily in privately owned buildings, began in 2000, when the homeless population was overwhelming city shelters. But with the city paying over $2,500 per month per family, the Clarkson Avenue building featured in Yee's story highlights the inefficiencies of a system wherein landlords stand to gain more from sheltering homeless people than by providing affordable housing for Section 8 voucher tenants and other low-income renters.
"Critics of the program, including advocates for homeless people, community leaders and elected officials, denounced it as a stopgap that papered over one problem only to worsen another, pushing low-income residents out of their homes and removing otherwise affordable apartments from circulation," reports Yee.
The program was supposed to be temporary, but the number of homeless people living in cluster-site buildings has steadily increased. The money designated to the program is also supposed to provide social services, including building security and employment assistance. However, conditions have deteriorated in these buildings. In one Ditmas Park building, "people loitered in the common areas, openly using drugs. Cockroaches clustered in the light fixture and refrigerator. Doors and windows were broken. The bathroom was moldy and pocked with rodent holes. There was no stove."
FULL STORY: Homeless Families Endure Roaches, Mice and Failed Promises

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

Canada vs. Kamala: Whose Liberal Housing Platform Comes Out on Top?
As Canada votes for a new Prime Minister, what can America learn from the leading liberal candidate of its neighbor to the north?

The Five Most-Changed American Cities
A ranking of population change, home values, and jobs highlights the nation’s most dynamic and most stagnant regions.

San Diego Adopts First Mobility Master Plan
The plan provides a comprehensive framework for making San Diego’s transportation network more multimodal, accessible, and sustainable.

Housing, Supportive Service Providers Brace for Federal Cuts
Organizations that provide housing assistance are tightening their purse strings and making plans for maintaining operations if federal funding dries up.

Op-Ed: Why an Effective Passenger Rail Network Needs Government Involvement
An outdated rail network that privileges freight won’t be fixed by privatizing Amtrak.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Village of Glen Ellyn
Central Transportation Planning Staff/Boston Region MPO
Heyer Gruel & Associates PA
Institute for Housing and Urban Development Studies (IHS)
City of Grandview
Harvard GSD Executive Education
Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada
Toledo-Lucas County Plan Commissions