Of all the inventions of the modern world, few have been so embraced as artificial light. But constant light, like that which floods city streets and illuminates buildings, is not necessarily healthy or safe. Some cities are trying to go dark.

Electric light has made cities eminently more functional, and visually riotous, than they otherwise would have been. It's the externality that no one seems to mind. Satellite photos of nighttime in the United States, revealing vast lightening-colored blobs and streaks, testify to the ways that we have altered the visual landscape. What is good for functionality may not, however, be good for human health, the environment, our sense of wonder, and even our safety.
Emerging research suggests that our constant flood of light is, via hormonal disruption and sleep disorders, doing awful things to our metabolism and overall health. It confuses animals and creates a "monochrome canopy of muted light grey to almost-but-not-quite-black, dotted, depending on the size of your city, with a dim handful of stars." Surprisingly, excessive light may not make cities more safe or easier to navigate. It turns out that the human eye responds more to contrasts -- whatever the background level of light may be -- than to brightness as such.
A new generation of architects, planners, and lighting designers are figuring out ways to light cities and buildings more smartly, efficiently, and attractively, without incurring the glare and leakage that characterizes the majority of outdoor lighting. "The trick is to illuminate change—steps, doors, paths—rather than entire landscapes."
“There is no universally applicable conclusion that comes out of criminology research that shows that more light means less crime.” Overlighting, in fact, can be worse than dimly lit spaces for several reasons, beginning with the risk of glare. As USC Professor Travis Longcore put it, “If you have bright lights, the shadows become much darker.”
FULL STORY: Darker, Safer

Planetizen Federal Action Tracker
A weekly monitor of how Trump’s orders and actions are impacting planners and planning in America.

San Francisco's School District Spent $105M To Build Affordable Housing for Teachers — And That's Just the Beginning
SFUSD joins a growing list of school districts using their land holdings to address housing affordability challenges faced by their own employees.

The Tiny, Adorable $7,000 Car Turning Japan Onto EVs
The single seat Mibot charges from a regular plug as quickly as an iPad, and is about half the price of an average EV.

Seattle's Plan for Adopting Driverless Cars
Equity, safety, accessibility and affordability are front of mind as the city prepares for robotaxis and other autonomous vehicles.

As Trump Phases Out FEMA, Is It Time to Flee the Floodplains?
With less federal funding available for disaster relief efforts, the need to relocate at-risk communities is more urgent than ever.

With Protected Lanes, 460% More People Commute by Bike
For those needing more ammo, more data proving what we already knew is here.
Urban Design for Planners 1: Software Tools
This six-course series explores essential urban design concepts using open source software and equips planners with the tools they need to participate fully in the urban design process.
Planning for Universal Design
Learn the tools for implementing Universal Design in planning regulations.
Smith Gee Studio
City of Charlotte
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
City of Astoria
Transportation Research & Education Center (TREC) at Portland State University
US High Speed Rail Association
City of Camden Redevelopment Agency
Municipality of Princeton (NJ)